Its pretty obvious that he was the only one engaging in criminal activity.”””
Look again at the video of the strong-arm robbery.
He had an accomplice in that action-—who then became ‘the first eye-witness’ to the shooting & said Michael was shot in the back///was kneeling on the ground///had his hands up.
This guy was a co-conspiritor in the robery. He has absolutely NO credibility at all,.
my point is that the police officer was engaged in self defense. the thug is the party breaking the law and incorrectly referred to as a victim.