Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/19/2014 11:10:06 AM PDT by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: All
Good article on Phyllis Schlafly turning 90 last Friday.

Phyllis Schlafly Turns 90 Today

2 posted on 08/19/2014 11:15:52 AM PDT by jazusamo (Sometimes I think that this is an era when sanity has become controversial: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Army Air Corps

Bookmark


3 posted on 08/19/2014 11:22:21 AM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo
Besides, the laws for spousal rights, both state and federal, run so deep government could never be pried from the marriage equation.

Those benefits are also what has driven the same sex marriage agenda in my opinion.

4 posted on 08/19/2014 11:26:55 AM PDT by sonofagun (Some think my cynicism grows with age. I like to think of it as wisdom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Please bump the Freepathon or click above to donate or become a monthly donor!

7 posted on 08/19/2014 11:55:50 AM PDT by jazusamo (Sometimes I think that this is an era when sanity has become controversial: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

FR Needs Donors To Survive

Please Donate!

8 posted on 08/19/2014 12:09:55 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo; 185JHP; 230FMJ; AKA Elena; APatientMan; Albion Wilde; Aleighanne; Alexander Rubin; ...
Libertarians here are always clamoring for the governemt to get out of marriage. Did they get that idiotic idea from their heroes like Rand, Hayek, Rothbard or von Mises? Nope. Try Marx.

Moral Absolutes Ping!

Freepmail Responsibility2nd or wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list. FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search [ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]


9 posted on 08/19/2014 12:16:36 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

The good don’t always die young.


10 posted on 08/19/2014 12:31:10 PM PDT by allblues (God is neither a Republican nor a Democrat but Satan is definitely a Democrat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo
Marx wanted to break the family so that children could be raised and educated communally, free from patriarchal ties and religious beliefs.

Mrs. Schlafly doesn't isolate the nexus here, but does come close (to have gone there would have been a distracting digression that would have required too many column inches to allow in this medium).

There are four possible sources of authority in life: The family, G_d, employers, and the state. To a child, not yet of working age, the employer does not apply, leaving only the almighty state.

Marx supposedly wanted to dispose of all but the state, yet no matter what, but production, defense, or any "ordered" system must be hierarchical to function: collective "consensus" has NEVER worked by common consent. Hence, "communism" always led to tyranny and thus was essentially fascism, as is evidenced by the fact that Marx' Manifesto was financed by the wealthiest bankers in Europe. It was to be a means of concentrating power for the manipulation by the few, cloaked in a supposedly cultural altruism. G_d's system of voluntary charity focuses upon families united in faith as the source of temporal authority and thereby liberty, Marx' exact opposite.

11 posted on 08/19/2014 1:57:58 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (Democrats: the Party of slavery to the immensely wealthy for over 200 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

Now, since the family and human society at large spring from marriage, these men will on no account allow matrimony to be the subject of the jurisdiction of the Church. Nay, they endeavor to deprive it of all holiness, and so bring it within the contracted sphere of those rights which, having been instituted by man, are ruled and administered by the civil jurisprudence of the community. Wherefore it necessarily follows that they attribute all power over marriage to civil rulers, and allow none whatever to the Church; and, when the Church exercises any such power, they think that she acts either by favor of the civil authority or to its injury. Now is the time, they say, for the heads of the State to vindicate their rights unflinchingly, and to do their best to settle all that relates to marriage according as to them seems good.

—Rabid Marxist Libertarian Pope Leo XIII, 1880

Freegards


12 posted on 08/19/2014 2:04:28 PM PDT by Ransomed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

We might “call a truce on social issues,” but the Left has no intention to ever call a truce. And “social issues” are a Trojan horse for every fiscal issue.


16 posted on 08/20/2014 4:32:24 AM PDT by fwdude (The last time the GOP ran an "extremist," Reagan won 44 states.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson