I’ve been in training and haven’t been listening as much to radio or posting/reading here. So my observations may be cliche.
What it is that I see is a distinct demographic responsible for the civil disturbances while just having received a week ago the most current warning from DHS about sovereign citizens and conservatives being a danger to the country.
I find that to be completely under-analyzed in media.
I hope it’s been analyzed here.
IMHO, the militarization of the police is a distraction (a symptom) from the real problems...makes good news, but doesn’t solve anything or get discussion toward that end either.
If the claim had been made prior, credit where credit is due.
——under-analyzed in media——
To make such a statement is to illustrate total misunderstanding. The problem or subcultural condition is not under analyzed, it is purposely ignored by the media. The media of which you speak is first and foremost not media but but propaganda.
The reality being put forward is one that protects the Democrat party. There can be no analysis, no critical production of any event or particle of evidence contrary to the propagandistic narrative.
It can be well argued that the event precipitating the riots must and will be prolonged as long as possible to inflame enough voters to turnout in November to prevent loss of the Senate. Nothing else on the horizon matters. The Senate must be maintained at all costs. All costs can and does involve activity bordering on criminal.
Given the lawless mindset of the President, I question that capture of the Senate will have any real effect because the action will be ignored anyway. America is going to learn that drastic measures will be required to end the tyranny