Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Secret Agent Man

I worry that we can’t trust five justices at the SCOTUS to rule on the traditional side in this matter.


19 posted on 08/20/2014 3:29:26 PM PDT by tbw2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: tbw2

“I worry that we can’t trust five justices at the SCOTUS to rule on the traditional side in this matter.”
***************************************************************************************

Well, at least I hope we can trust them to correctly say that each state has a right to define marriage as its citizens see fit.


24 posted on 08/20/2014 4:01:01 PM PDT by House Atreides (ANOTHER CONSERVATIVE REPUBLICAN FOR CHILDERS 2014 .... Don't reward bad GOPe behavior.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: tbw2

I worry that we can’t trust five justices at the SCOTUS to rule on the traditional side in this matter.


I can practically guarantee that 5 supremes will rule that traditional marriage is discriminatory and has to go.

Anthony Kennedy has been salivating to do this for decades. And, of course, the four supremes appointed by RATS will rule that way. Kennedy wanted to do this with the California Prop 8 case but Roberts and Scalia were afraid of the bad PR for the court so they got the RATS to go along with the bogus sidestep of claiming that the defendants, who had been ratified by the CA supremes, actually did not have standing.


31 posted on 08/20/2014 5:13:26 PM PDT by fifedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: tbw2

Roberts has proven he can’t be trusted, and Kennedy was never to be trusted.


66 posted on 08/22/2014 3:06:31 PM PDT by Impy (Think for yourself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson