Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cold Heat
Yes. But the moment they start bleeding into their lungs, even the most casual of observers would conclude that there is respiratory involvement.

Someone with an agenda and the full weight of the judicial system on their side could make that leap without their feet ever leaving the ground.

13 posted on 08/23/2014 8:31:49 AM PDT by null and void (If Bill Clinton was the first black president, why isn't Barack Obama the first woman president?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: null and void

Far as I know, they don’t bleed into their lungs...

Only smooth muscle and tissues are affected...skin, gums, throat, intestines...other organs..

The lungs are totally different...and to my knowledge, not affected by any ebola strain with one exception and that is the reston strain, which only affects animals and is not dangerous to humans.

So it’s not respiratory...


15 posted on 08/23/2014 8:37:15 AM PDT by Cold Heat (Have you reached your breaking point yet? If not now....then when?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: null and void

I would never argue that governments won’t do the interpretations that make sense to them at the time. But I don’t think that is the point.

I think this change to the regs was made for SARS and other similar respiratory diseases that are not flu and maybe bacterial and not viruses.

Not Ebola.....


18 posted on 08/23/2014 8:41:48 AM PDT by Cold Heat (Have you reached your breaking point yet? If not now....then when?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson