[null and void]

Re-read section (b).

The "or's" could well be argued to mean respiratory diseases 'OR have the potential to cause, a pandemic, OR, upon infection, are highly likely to cause mortality OR serious morbidity if not properly controlled.'

I'm sure Holder, Jarret, et al. will hold out for the narrowest, least intrusive, most freedom protecting interpretation of this de facto law of the land.

Aren't you?

[Kozak]

Those seem to be subordinate clauses to the respiratory disease section.
But hell, I’m a doctor not a shyster.....