“As I said earlier, the virus of white privilege survives by convincing its host organism that it does not exist. That’s because the more clearly we see it the more likely we are to notice that its purported benefits have faded almost to nothing.”
This is fantastic! Here’s how it works: it doesn’t really exist because as the author says, there is no or badly shrinking benefit therefrom, but that’s an unfortunate delusion for those so afflicted. See, there’s nothing delusional about saying that something that does not exist actually DOES exist, because that allows a magazine article that self-assumes that the writer is so smart and perceptive that he can see stuff that doesn’t exist but claim that it actually DOES exist! Especially if there’s no evidence that it exists!
What a frickin’ waste of neurons.
The “gentleman” who spewed this copious barrage of nonsense looks like he could be Pajama Boy’s father.
Just my opinion.
I'm quite sure that the only neurons wasted were yours, from reading this drivel. The author obviously didn't use any neurons while writing it.
The author should kill himself if he feels bad enough...
Like the circular argument of being asked if you’re an alcoholic (or insert other vice/habit here) and responding in the negative and then being told “denial is a symptom, see, you really are”...
As has been said:
“Jackson and Sharpton are the Coke and Pepsi of ‘the race baiting industry’ and the author of this article is only the club soda, but eats at the same table. .....nothing written worth writing home about.