Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Is It So Hard for Employers to Fill These Jobs?
The Daily Signal ^ | August 23, 2014 | Stephen Moore

Posted on 08/24/2014 6:54:55 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-179 next last
To: 2ndDivisionVet
One reason is the curse of the so-called “skills mismatch.”

It's the "character mismatch." They aren't teachable. And I'm not talking about minority urban youth, here.

41 posted on 08/24/2014 7:32:07 AM PDT by Mr. Jeeves ([CTRL-GALT-DELETE])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

Technical high schools, not colleges— to train highly trained blue collar workers in continuously upgraded skillsets to match technology needs.

NOT sending an illiterate barely passed high school “grad” to “college” on a student loan to learn.... “women’s studies” or
“interpersonal relations” or origami. 200k later no skills and a professional whiner and teat sucker.


42 posted on 08/24/2014 7:33:28 AM PDT by John S Mosby (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
The US has got to get serious about developing a generation of competent adults who have a work ethic and who want to take personal responsibility. Every generation has a good percentage of such people -- but, overall, our system seems less and less capable of producing the people we need. We have to fix our system -- and Common Core isn't helping.

All Employment Growth Since 2000 Went to Immigrants Number of U.S.-born not working grew by 17 million

Government data show that since 2000 all of the net gain in the number of working-age (16 to 65) people holding a job has gone to immigrants (legal and illegal). This is remarkable given that native-born Americans accounted for two-thirds of the growth in the total working-age population. Though there has been some recovery from the Great Recession, there were still fewer working-age natives holding a job in the first quarter of 2014 than in 2000, while the number of immigrants with a job was 5.7 million above the 2000 level.


43 posted on 08/24/2014 7:34:46 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: flamberge
In some cases "corporate executives" are under conflicting pressures to maintain high quality and encourage longevity among their workers, while at the same time keeping labor costs down. I'd say these are mutually exclusive in most industries. You're probably more likely to find this in publicly traded companies where there is a huge knowledge gap between management and ownership about how to manage the business effectively.

They don’t want to pay for training workers either.

I don't know what kind of experience you have, but from what I've seen this is not the case at all. If anything, there is a stronger emphasis on training now than ever before. This is driven by the fact that most industries encounter dramatic change over very short periods of time, and it doesn't serve anyone's interests to have workers whose knowledge isn't up to date.

44 posted on 08/24/2014 7:35:26 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("What in the wide, wide world of sports is goin' on here?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: John S Mosby

45 posted on 08/24/2014 7:36:28 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Something not mentioned in the article, but alluded to by stating the jobs lack glamore: most of these jobs require some degree of manual work IOW something besides sitting at a desk drawing a paycheck while “engaged” with a desk top or lap top electron channeling modification devise. Couple that with the notion of “well, without getting my hands dirty, I may get less money but at least I don’t have to get up every day” and you have what the welfare society breathes.

Pay someone to do it, even if it nothing, and you get more of it.


46 posted on 08/24/2014 7:40:05 AM PDT by Mouton (The insurrection laws perpetuate what we have for a government now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

~ They typically pay between $50,000 and $90,000 a year and with benefits the compensation can climb to $100,000. That’s rich in most nations ~

Is it a joke. From my knowledge everything including food, clothing, electronics, vehicles, even real estates are 50% to three times less expensive in the US comparing to Europe or Russia. How someone in a sane mind could ever consider a $90,000 job undesirable on this terms? I know that as an exception from the rule above legal advise and medical services are priced atrociously in US but you must be a really sick gangster to complain.


47 posted on 08/24/2014 7:40:06 AM PDT by wetphoenix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Too many potheads

Bingo!

I'm working part time in a restaurant. If a drug test were required we'd lose half our work force immediately, rather then the normal 1 or 2 month turnover rate.

Real jobs with real pay and benefits mostly require passing a drug test.

48 posted on 08/24/2014 7:43:30 AM PDT by ASA Vet (Don't assume Shahanshah Obama will allow another election.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rbg81

In the 1800s the British used drugs to win a lot of China, and it worked. America better be careful.


49 posted on 08/24/2014 7:45:13 AM PDT by tillacum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

"Too many potheads."

The manufacturing industry is built on a sub culture of drugs and alcohol. It's amazing the number of guys who immediately smoke a one-hitter or start getting drunk before their cars are even out of the parking lot after work. Hell, they often start over lunch. Every day! If the manufacturing sector ever actually started to enforce drug policies, they'd lose 3/4ths of their employees. Many of whom actually do their jobs quite well. And this includes managers and foremen.

50 posted on 08/24/2014 7:45:33 AM PDT by TruthBeforeAll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
I'm a factory rep with a fortune 500 pump company. I supervise contractors installing and repairing industrial equipment in the energy, power and municipal water industries. I have unlimited access to every nuclear power plant in the world.

The pay for what I do and the associated risk is not anywhere near what is appropriate.

After 35 years in this industry, I'm leaving. The final straw was what obamacare allowed industry to do to our health plans - shift costs to employees - that and non negotiable wage increases which are less that the rate of inflation. Corporate America thinks they can find illiterate immigrants to do what I do? - I wish them all the luck in the world.

51 posted on 08/24/2014 7:47:10 AM PDT by atc23 (The Confederacy was the single greatest conservative resistance to federal authority ever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Contributing to this attitude is the wide availability of unemployment insurance, food stamps, mortgage bailout funds and other welfare. Taking these taxpayer handouts is somehow seen as normal and a first, not a last resort.

This is the heart of the problem. People don't need to work. They just live off the government.

That is why real unemployment is over 25%.

We are in a depression. It has been engineered to put totalitarians in power and keep them there.

52 posted on 08/24/2014 7:48:25 AM PDT by DakotaGator (Weep for the lost Republic! And keep your powder dry!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kabar

70% of illegals in Texas are on welfare and many are probably in jail, so I don’t think anyone with half a brain cell functioning would see that as a “solution”.


53 posted on 08/24/2014 7:50:11 AM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo
So a kid with a 200,000 education is too unskilled to get a 0-100k job but an illegal sneaking over the border has the skills?

We bring in 1.1 million PERMANENT LEGAL IMMIGRANTS A YEAR. 36% of them have college degrees and 20% lack even a high school degree. In addition, we import 640,000 guest workers a year with many of them being skilled. The Gang of 8 bill wants to triple legal immigration and double the guest worker programs. Do you think that will have an impact on the American worker?


54 posted on 08/24/2014 7:50:33 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: flamberge
Corporate executives do not want to pay free market wages for workers. They prefer a system that will supply indentured servants with no recourse in the political or economic arenas. They don’t want to pay for training workers either. That is the reality behind the so-called “skills gap>

BINGO

55 posted on 08/24/2014 7:51:04 AM PDT by atc23 (The Confederacy was the single greatest conservative resistance to federal authority ever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I agree 100%. Our department is always needing young high school kids for summer help. If we are lucky, we might get 1 out of 15 who pass the drug test. When we do get a kid who passes, he might work for 2 weeks before going back to leeching off of mom and dad.


56 posted on 08/24/2014 7:52:16 AM PDT by neal1960 (D m cr ts S ck. Would you like to buy a vowel?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ASA Vet

There are other problems as well.

We have positions open where I work but have a heck of a time filling them. It’s not that there’s a bunch of people who can’t do the job. We get a good number of applications from qualified people.

From what my boss tells me, the problem arises when they try to interview. I work on a military post. When the potential applicant comes to the security office at the gate to get a temporary pass to get on post, they do a preliminary background check right there. The vast majority find they can’t get on post due to past problems with the law. Can’t access the post, no interview. My boss says that it’s a rather high percentage of applicants that get stopped at that point.


57 posted on 08/24/2014 7:52:57 AM PDT by hoagy62 ("Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered..."-Thomas Paine. 1776)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$
80% think they are overqualified

I had an interview once, at which I was told that I was overqualified for the position. I told the HR person, "I promise to work below my ability." That didn't help.

58 posted on 08/24/2014 7:58:35 AM PDT by ASA Vet (Don't assume Shahanshah Obama will allow another election.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
I'll come out in just say it. Most Americans do not have a work ethic. Once the balance tilted between leisure time and work time, Americans decided that they would rather take the leisure time. Thus they demand "flexible hours" at work, insist on taking all the "sick" days that are "due" to them, and generally come up with every excuse in the book for not coming to work on a particular day. "My aunt is ill...my basement is flooded...I have to take my car to the mechanic...my heat won't come on...my kid is home from school and I have no babysitter..."

And on and on. As somebody who runs a large department, I've heard them all. Every little inconvenience in life is presented to me as "high drama" and thus a reason for them not to come to work or to show up late.

Employees have taken days off to binge-watch a season of a TV show on Netflix. They've taken the Friday before the Super Bowl so that they can "prepare" for the party - and then of course, they needed to take the Monday after off as well. One employee was taking her daughter to a Justin Beiber concert that night and she needed the afternoon off to pull her daughter out of school early and get ready for it.

Many Americans do not take their jobs seriously. They generally do not aspire to move up the ladder either. They are content to do a "simple" job so that they can punch in and punch out of on a regular schedule so they can get home to have leisure time. Yet they are the first ones to gripe when they get a 2% raise or are asked to work a little overtime.

I think the bottom line is that there is so much leisure available that work has now become a nuisance for most people. They would rather stay home and watch their television shows or surf the Internet than to get up and come to work in the morning. And if they can fake or exaggerate a "disability", they will sit home and collect Worker's comp, SSI, or even welfare as long as we keep sending them checks.

59 posted on 08/24/2014 7:59:44 AM PDT by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Mr. Funk cites figures that more than half of the applicants for these kinds of jobs in the temporary job market can’t pass a drug test. “They are unemployable in that case,” he says regretfully.

That's a big part of the problem, right there. Besides, they won't need their own insurance until they are 26...

Some of it, in all fairness is the location, weather (climate) considerations, and sometimes the expense of living there.

60 posted on 08/24/2014 7:59:57 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-179 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson