>”Hitler was entirely revolutionary, not Fabian”<
Even though Hitler may not have been a member of the Fabian Society, it seems that both were (Fabian Socialists still are) after the same result. Hitler was influenced by Marxism and supported by Fabian Socialists and so didn’t emerge from a vacuum like I used to think which was my point.
Marx, Hitler, Fabians - they seem like peas in the same pod. Here is Fabian Socialist George Bernard Shaw commending and supporting Hitler and his mass murders.
http://www.infowars.com/george-bernard-shaw-defends-hitler-mass-murder/
Far be it from me to defend the likes of Shaw, but your video makes clear that he opposed Hitler's mass exterminations based on "race."
Sure, you might say it's a distinction without a difference, but what Shaw had in mind was "purifying" society by eliminating those few who were weak or deformed.
He did not approve of Hitler's efforts to exterminate entire groups for the benefit of one "master race".
Again, I'm not defending Shaw, only pointing out the distinctions.