Posted on 08/25/2014 8:01:34 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
Fox News recently had a political story noting that in several close Senate races in red states, Libertarian candidates might keep the Republican nominee from winning seats held by Democrats today. In the last three election cycles, liberal Democrats in Senate races have won races with less than half the vote, and with the majority of the vote going to the Republican nominee and candidates more conservative than that nominee.
In 2008, Mark Begich won in Alaska with 47.8% of the vote, while Republican Ted Stevens earned 46.6% and Bob Bird of the Alaska Independence Party, endorsed by Ron Paul, won 4.2%. Al Franken in Minnesota won 41.99% of the vote, while Republican Norm Coleman won 41.98% and Dean Barkley, a Perot and Ventura supporter, got 15.1% of the vote. Jeff Merkely in Oregon got 48.9% of the vote, while Gordon Smith received 45.6% and Constitution Party candidate Dave Brownlow won 5.2% of the vote. In 2012, the same pattern emerged.
How much have leftist Democrats prospered by the division of conservative votes? Consider that Democrat Jon Test in Montana in 2006 got 49.2% of the vote, while Republican Conrad Burns got 48.3% of the vote and Libertarian Stan Jones got 2.6%, and then in 2012, Democrat Jon Tester won 48.6% of the vote, while Republican Denny Rehberg got 44.9% while Libertarian Dan Cox received 6.1%. Tester won his seat and then six years later defended it because his opposition was split.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Screw the GOPe, conservatives need to band together.
Ah yes. The libertarian agenda.
When they’re not out promoting legal marijuana; they’re helping get democrats elected.
I hate Ron Paul and the rest of these minor candidates, they simply insure that the RAT “leadership” is perpetuated. Yeah, I know about the RINO problem, but these people’s candidacies are not the answer. Ross Perot was from the same kettle of fish and we are still reeling from his involvement in politics. Just a little pimple on the a$$hole of progress in my view.
And because of simple mind fool the same thing will happen in 2016. Dumb Republican voters just don’t get it and probably never will. Third party and write in have destroyed America at the ballot box. They act like spoiled children that never grew up.
Maybe if the Republicans ran more conservative candidates then this wouldn’t happen.
I don’t think it would take much digging to reveal that most third party candidates are supported by the DNC and, in some instances, the RNC/GOP-e.
There is a huge difference between libertarians and Libertarians. I consider Libertarians as 85% as pot smoking hedonists and low empathy, subclinical sociopaths. Small “L” libertarians... well, they wrote and put in place the U.S. Constitution.
There is a huge difference between libertarians and Libertarians. I consider Libertarians as 85% as pot smoking hedonists and low empathy, subclinical sociopaths. Small “L” libertarians... well, they wrote and put in place the U.S. Constitution.
But let's not look at the fact Republicans could have some or even most of those Libertarians voting for them.... if they acted less like Democrats.
Nope! let's blame the 'spoilers'.
There is no such thing as this exalted conservative in the eyes of fools.
They do not like choices so they want to corrupt the system even worse than it is
This sounds like the establishment protection plan to me
sorry for the double reply... “first world problems” using my phone to post.
The banty rooster from Texas got bill clinton elected , twice.
Perhaps people do not vote for the Big Two because they are not members or supporters of either party? Radical idea for some, I realize.
There is no difference, the party is a perfect representation of libertarianism, but libertarians are dishonest enough to constantly be telling us that they are not libertarians, they are just conservatives who like to use a different name.
Libertarians alter the emphasis of their messaging depending on the audience and venue.
He was also anti-gun, and pro-abortion, yet his personality and mannerisms won people from the left and right, who followed him based on a cultish personality reaction to him.
Gee, if you disagree with the GOP platform, then stop running as one! Tea party conservatives need to get their act together and run as independents if they want to be taken seriously. Otherwise they will forever come off as the screw-ball candidate.
Libertarian-party nominee Robert Sarvis, who won 6.5 percent of the vote in a race Democrat Terry McAuliffe carried by just over two percentage points, was clearly a factor. While some of Sarvis’s vote came from people who wouldn’t otherwise have voted in the race or would have supported McAuliffe, there is evidence that most of Sarvis’s 145,000 votes would have gone to Cuccinelli had Sarvis not been on the ballot.
Ironically, most libertarians I know in Virginia didn’t vote for Sarvis. They listened to former Libertarian-party presidential nominee Ron Paul and his son, Senator Rand Paul, who argued that it would be “insane” for someone to vote for Sarvis over Cuccinelli, a highly aggressive opponent of Obamacare and climate-change taxation while he was state attorney general.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.