Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 2ndDivisionVet
That prospect has sparked an intense debate over how the disputed language ended up in the law....

There is no debate about it at all.

The language was changed to remove subsidies for Federal exchanges because if it wasn't changed the law would not have passed.

That being the case, a court decision that this fact is irrelevant would be - revolutionary.

22 posted on 08/26/2014 3:51:32 AM PDT by Jim Noble (When strong, avoid them. Attack their weaknesses. Emerge to their surprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Jim Noble

“When a federal appeals court ruled last month that a seemingly arcane wording flaw in the Affordable Care Act should invalidate a central part of the law...........”

Odumbo simply revises the law on his own”.

There, finished it.


23 posted on 08/26/2014 3:59:03 AM PDT by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson