Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: the scotsman

Oh lighten up. Funny how you all forget WHY we burned the WH.

<><><<

LOL.

Because the Brits were still in a bit of a snit over a war that had ended a couple of decades earlier, and needed to be reminded of that outcome again?

Or was it because the British land forces couldnt accomplish anything terribly strategic, so they did something petty?

Personally I find the ‘outrage’ over this story just incredibly silly.


56 posted on 08/26/2014 6:20:27 AM PDT by dmz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: dmz

1—BOTH sides were spoiling for a fight in 1812.

2—The British had several major victories in the war, on land and sea (the war was a draw, despite the US belief since that they won, mainly due to one famous victory, which didn’t end the war). And the British drove the US out of Canada, retained control over half of N America. The fact is BOTH sides failed and succeeded in their strategies in that war.

3—Petty?. YOU burnt Toronto first.


61 posted on 08/26/2014 6:28:35 AM PDT by the scotsman (UK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

To: dmz; the scotsman

Actually, it was in retaliation for U.S. forces burning the Canadian capital at York, Ontario. Tit-for-tat.


68 posted on 08/26/2014 6:36:10 AM PDT by Oratam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson