Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sherman Logan; butterdezillion; donna; GeronL; Pollster1
Thanks for that link, but it still makes no sense.

The report says five (or is it eight) Pakistani men were convicted in 2010 of raping seven white children, but provided no details -- did they walk into the schools and grab children?
How does this go on and "nobody knows"?

Then we are told, no the number was 50 girls, but now it's 58, as of 2012.
But then three members of one family alone abused 61 girls!
How does this happen?
Are there no parents? No teachers? No police?
Sixty-one girls and not one complained? Nobody ever knew?

Now we see a report where it's said, no, the number is not seven children raped, it's not 58, it's not another 61, it's 1,400!

The mind boggles, the head spins, are we talking about England here, or Britistan?

I don't believe this data, I don't "get" what's going on, something is wrong -- very wrong -- with this entire picture.

What is it?



25 posted on 08/27/2014 3:07:38 PM PDT by BroJoeK (a little historical perspective...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: BroJoeK

The 1400 girls are supposedly in an area of South Yorkshire of around 200,000 population.

Most if not all of these unfortunate girls were from the English white underclass, which bears remarkable similarities to our own black underclass. See the writings of Theodore Dalrymple.

IOW, there isn’t a father around, and generally not all that much in the way of a mother.


27 posted on 08/27/2014 3:34:19 PM PDT by Sherman Logan (Perception wins all the battles. Reality wins all the wars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson