so, this judge says that in spite of the law, it’s OK to murder babies.
Misogynist liberal who hates women. Typical.
I’m not familiar with the towns affected. Are they by any chance in heavily black neighborhoods?
This clown is an OBozo nominee that hasn’t a clue. This ruling will be overturned in the next court up!
Because it isn’t in the best interest of a woman whose life is threatened by complications from abortion to be able to be admitted to a hospital quickly,right? I mean, what could go wrong that a storefront clinic couldn’t handle? How can anyone argue that abortion+ NO hospital if necessary is GOOD for women?
Whole lotta these judges ought be impeached then tried and hung.
One of the major problems with federal Democrats wrongly establishing vote-winning federal healthcare programs outside the framework of the Constitution since the FDR administration, such programs actually based on state powers and state revenues which the corrupt feds have stolen from the states, is that healthcare has never been enumerated as a constitutionally protected right. So the misguided federal judge referenced in the article is wrong to stop Gov. Jindal from exercising 10th Amendment-protected state power to regulate state healthcare policy in the absence of constitutional protections imo.
And I suspect that Gov. Jindal may not know enough about the federal government’s constitutionally limited powers and the reason why the Founding States enumerated certain protections into the amendable Constitution to argue the same point.