I do understand your point. ‘Asian’ is Brit speak for what might be more accurately termed ‘South Asian’ or would likely have been called ‘Indian’ before 1948. I think many here are comparing the British press’s use of ‘Asian’ to the American press’s use of ‘teen’. Everyone knows what a large group of ‘teens’ rampaging through a mall really is.
Does Britain suffer from a large number Hindu (or Christian Arab) rape gangs?
That’s right, your ‘teen’ or ‘yute’ analogy is good, and ‘Asian’ means Muslim Paki in this context, because the answer to your last question is ‘No’.
Not nearly. The long report makes the comparison of about 95% muslim vs 5% other groups. The perps were overwhelmingly muslim and the victims were overwhelmingly white. It is rape jihad. To try to excuse it as a cultural phenomenon common to all "Asians" is disgraceful.
That is why several of us keep trying to explain to expat2 the heinousness of willfully misleading the public as to which group presents the danger. In fact, one of the British television stations prepared a warning video with specific warnings about the doctrine of rape jihad to try to reach an audience of young girls, but it was suppressed by the "anti-racist" PC crowd in the media and never shown. How many young girls were damaged for life because of this monstrous fascism? How many young teens had abortions, even repeated abortions, ruining them possibly forever? How many children bore other children who are now technically considered muslim, making them and their mothers captives of jihadists?