An ectopic pregnancy being ended hardly constitutes murder....
Regardless of the reason, doubling down on her “claim to fame” has to be an unbelievably absurd “tactic”, IMO.
Basically, she’s resorted to basing her entire campaign upon abortion, regardless of the consequences.
In the end, this race will reflect more upon the state and values of our society. It now has nothing to do with her other than her being a figurehead that reflects upon one segment of society against the rest (be it different segments or the rest as a whole).
This race reflects the path of the future of this country, IMO.
If she wins, CW2 is inevitable. If she loses, as she absolutely should, it will simply forestall the inevitability of scenario 1.
Sooner or later, CW2 must commence, and although this “reason” (abortion) will not be the deciding factor, it WILL be a barometer of what is to come, IMO.
I have waited to respond. Mainly because others can argue better than I can (medically) on this subject. As you can see, all the following comments (after yours) reinforce
my simple statement (especially #19) ... murder.
“An ectopic pregnancy being ended hardly constitutes murder...” You got that right. The surgical removal of a fallopian tube in which is lodged an embryo is NOT abortion and is not condemned by even the Catholic Church. The mother and baby are equally at risk when an embryo attaches in the tube. In a perfect world, the embryo could be surgically removed from the fallopian tube, then surgically implanted in the uterus. However, medicine has not advanced that far.
Ending the life of one where both would otherwise die is not the same thing as ending the life of one where otherwise both would live.