As it was in the case with Gaza, it will not be declared a 'crisis' -- and there will be no calls for cease-fire -- until there is retaliation. There will be no need for white people punching out black pregnant women or beating up anyone else who is the wrong color in the wrong place at the wrong time -- particularly the elderly, disabled and/or small [as is the case with the #knockOUTgame] -- for there to be outrage from the politicians and the press.
We are seeing people protesting that a violent sociopath was killed because he was put down like the rabid dog he was. So, they get to beat up our little old ladies and expect their thugs to not be dealt with in response.
What confidence can law-abiding citizens have that their government is going to protect them under these conditions? What sort of effect is treating people differently under the law and in the press [based upon who they are rather than what they do] going to have on civil order and the Rule of Law?
This country is on the brink of tearing itself apart on racial and ideological lines. What are our external enemies going to do while this Administration's Divide-and-Conquer strategy is in progress? Nothing? I doubt it.
As always when there is total war, innocents will suffer the most. Is this inevitable? The press and politicians are making it so by ignoring these atrocities.
CCW is your friend.
I think you are wrong. it is not a race war, it is a cultural war. It just so happens that the ethnicity of many of those that live in the violent ghetto culture are black. make no mistake about it, there are whites out there behaving in the exact same manner.
I am already planning future road trips to avoid major urban centers. Let these 3rd world islands rot.
This is exactly what Obozo and Holder want in America: a race war . . . and it’s getting there . . . they’ll be thrilled when it happens.
We are in a race war right now, but for the most part it is a cold war.
Unless you live in certain cities, of course.
Yes.
The liberals pushing this better be careful what they wish for, we haven’t played cowboys and Negros yet!
Let us not get too hyperbolic. This is political warfare on the street level. In Chicago they had that problem, roving gangs of blacks attacking non-blacks in the touristy trendy areas. The evil libtard elite downplayed it all the time, hushing it up, well one day the vibrants put the beatdown on a gay guy in a gay trendy area and that was it the libs started talking loudly about “HATE CRIMES” so vibrancy went back to normal levels. If we destroy the word “racist” as it applies today and sh*tcan the stupid and evil notion of “white guilt” we can right this ship.
Springfield, Missouri? If it is happening there, it can happen anywhere.
Sure is except for right now only one side is fighting.
If we had a race war, which races would join the whites, and which races would fight against them?
Succinctly put opening comment, walford.
Why is that question even raised after having witnessed so many “knockout game” scenes across the country?
Any guess if MLK’s “dream” will ever become a reality?
the question is how do you stop it, we dont want to be shooting each other, we all have friends and loved ones who will be chewed up if it goes to that.
But we must NOT allow fighting back to be defined as attacking any black near enough to strike, or we become as bad as the thugs. We could "set them up" by having vulnerable looking whites play bait while we keep surveillance nearby, then dispatching their attackers. But that is dangerous to the "bait". I volunteer to take the risk, if my backup is dependable. The attackers won't know I play b'ball a few times a week and am quicker than I look!
God forgive my hubris; He's been better to me than I deserve.
Out of the 1960s came black power, and black superiority movements and black anti-Whiteism, a hardened, violent, anti-white racism that has been fed by black leaders, the American left, the music industry, movies, TV, and print media, and in American education.
No, Jesus wasn’t black, and the white man did not destroy the power of flight when they destroyed the Negro Egyptian Empire, and Napoleon’s troops did not blow the nose off of the Sphinx because it reminded them of the “Black man’s majesty”.
The 13th Amendment was ratified in 1865.
The 14 Amendment was ratified in 1868.
The 15th Amendment was ratified in 1870.
So it has been 144 years.
Historically, a human "generation" has been variously defined as being 20-35 years. Current social disintegration and dysfunction have reversed the trend from the highest value ever used(35) back toward the lowest one (20.) So if we accept 27 as the average "generation" over the last 144 years, it has been 5+ generations since 1870.
It forever will be noted that the best experiment in democratic republican government, in its 221-year history, has passed three amendments to its Constitution addressing and favoring ONE, and only one, single race.
And that race has failed to join the millennia of societal evolution embracing the choice of being civilized over being barbaric, in effect if not in stated purpose.
The attempt has clearly failed.
Perhaps these three amendments should be repealed and replaced, for emphasis, with the clearer phrase from the Declaration of Independence,
...that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights...
The following words were spoken in 1890, and had the news subject of this thread been available then, through some magic, no significant debate would have been necessary to see the long term mischief and race wars that would become inevitable:
"The Republican party, he [Thomas B Reed] asserted, has a right to the Republican vote in the South, whatever the educational attainments of the voter. ; if ignorant, we need it to offset the Democratic ignorance which votes in New York and other large cities.* Why should they poll their ignorance, and we not poll ours?
Obviously, came the Southern retort, because federally supervised elections would bring 'Negro rule.'"
It was the risk of this that justified ballot-box stuffing, as not a few prominent Southerners had no compunction against publicly stating.
* The tyranny of large city-low IQ, low information populations determining the outcome of elections to the detriment of everyone was already a major problem in 1890.