Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SMGFan
The name "New Columbia" was being used the last time they pushed this idea. New Columbia is a stupid name--where is Old Columbia?

Another idea that has no chance of passing but might help stir passions in the Democratic base constituencies. Anyway, why should the remaining bits of land that would not be part of the new state be entitled to cast three electoral votes? It would be a "rotten borough" like those in England before the Reform Act of 1832.

5 posted on 09/08/2014 7:29:12 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Verginius Rufus
Anyway, why should the remaining bits of land that would not be part of the new state be entitled to cast three electoral votes?

Because those clymers stuck it in the Constitution as an amendment.

8 posted on 09/08/2014 7:30:37 PM PDT by Publius ("Who is John Galt?" by Billthedrill and Publius now available at Amazon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson