I didn’t quite follow this sentence: “I was always amazed about how we got laws against domestic violence negating consent of the abused not applying to some of the vile sex acts depicted.”
I’m not sure which clauses go together there. Could you unpack that in a few sentences?
I was always amazed about how we have laws against domestic violence negating testimonies including the consent/recant stories of the abused, but that the blatant pictorial evidence in porn is not used to prosecute some of the vile sex acts depicted.
Again, abortion culture favors pimps. Supposedly she is not a dependent when doing pornographic acts... it is her free will... and that marriage is not empowering her to free will.
I say bull sht on that.
We know a government tyranny is favored in that set up.