How do the laws against domestic violence negate testimonies?
The jury is asked by the prosecution and judge to invariably ignore the abused woman’s story when she says she was the one attacking or when she changes her story.
Domestic violence laws which make the State the plaintiff bypassing the need to wait for the woman to bring up charges has essentially taken women into their direct custody, but not so when the woman is having abortions or doing stuff “on her own” outside marriage.
Why, the State counts on its welfare recipients to be its dependents, providing them through the pimps their sexual needs and repressed life as low level animals in need.
“How do the laws against domestic violence negate testimonies?”
Can I answer this one? Domestic violence laws are a way of controlling and disarming both men and women. Whatever happened to Assault? I’ll tell you.
With “domestic violence” nobody presses charges. Except the police. So, if you get into an argument with your Mother, Father, Sister, Brother, Wife, Ex-wife, Ex-Girlfriend, Baby Momma, Baby Daddy or whoever, and the Police decide to intervene then somebody’s going to jail.
It doesn’t matter what the supposed “victim” say’s. It doesn’t matter what they don’t say. It doesn’t matter if there is no physical violence. It is what the police says it is. In the event that the “victim” actually calls the Police. You are going to jail. It doesn’t matter what the “victim” says when they get there. If the “victim” doesn’t want the case to go to trial? Doesn’t matter. If the victim previously made incriminating statements to the Police and wants to recant? Then they will be threatened with jail time for false reporting. There’s more........