[INVAR]

So for all the Party Hacks that lecture us and demand we "Hold our noses" and vote for the RINO Establishment leadership because they assert 'we have to win before we can do anything' - while there is no risk to losing the House, THIS reveals with clarity how the GOP is planning to GOVERN should it win both houses.

So what is the point in voting for them if they are going to do as the Democrats do?

The UniParty Oligarchy is germane to the problem and there is no fixing what ails this country by working within this system they have corrupted for themselves.

[Extremely Extreme Extremist]

I've been saying it on other threads only to get harassed and called names by other FReepers.

(1) The GOP will not win the Senate.

(2) The GOP will lose House seats and cling to a bare majority.

[cripplecreek]

I’ll take my chances and deal with republicans because I know the democrats are far worse and nothing but full on fascists who will kill us if given half a chance.

[tennmountainman]

Well said!

[dforest]

While GOPe makes me unhappy, democrats are far worse. There are no alternatives right now, so I don’t plan to be a fool and stay home.

I do not like Erickson because he spends more time hating GOP than he does democrats.

[SCHROLL]

Maybe it’s time for Conservatives to consider the Constitution Party and let the GOP die since it’s wellbeing on committing suicide.

[mrsmith]

It shows they don’t expect to have enough RINO votes in the House after the election.

This House election could be VERY good for conservatives.
Don’t want to count chickens before ... etc. But likely RINO losses and conservative wins are worrying the GOPE and that’s good news.

Work for a conservative House and you will be rewarded.

[A CA Guy]

No money to the RNC, leave it for the candidates that mirror your views. If there aren’t any, then so be it.

[indthkr]

corporate socialism bump for later.......

[Mr. Jeeves]

Imagine what happens to a young conservative in his first term, when a wise old eminence grise sits him down and has The Talk with him. The one that goes something like this:

"Look, son - I know you want to do right by your constituents and you think we are all a bunch of sellouts up here. But you have to understand how laws really get made. It takes a lot of money. It takes lot of support from a whole lot of people I don't like any better than you do. It takes help from the other side - and some of them do get it. They aren't all Communists over there. What I'm trying to say is that to get some of what you want, to help your voters out even a little bit, you've got to follow the process. And sometimes, that means voting for bills you don't like much at all - but some of what you want is in there and at the end of the day you've moved the ball a little closer to our goal line. Now I'm here to help you in any way I can, but you have to pay some attention to the leadership and to party discipline - or none of us will get any of what we want. Come on - I'll buy you lunch and we can talk some more about how it all works."

After the initial outrage wears off, even the staunchest conservative starts to realize that the old man just might be right. Getting a little bit of something positive done is a whole lot better than getting nothing at all. And it's a lot easier than fighting the whole party establishment, who are not paying attention to him, anyway. And thus, bit by bit, a new RINO is slowly born.

Aside from strict term limits it's hard to see any fix for this problem.

[INVAR]

Rush ranting about this now.

Mentions that they intend to include Amnesty in this slew of betrayals.