Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ray76

Anytime I read an article purporting to discuss the president’s views and actions, I first check to see if it’s satire. Reading what Obama says is like reading Mad Magazine or The Onion. Our problem in Syria is that Assad winning is the best possible outcome. But Assad has already been picked as an ally by Russia. Historically, we have to be on the other side from Russia. But it’s like a game where our opponent has already picked the best player. Given that view the best option is not to play in Syria. That leaves the Kurds and, possibly, some Iraqis. But the Shias have already been picked by Iran. (Oops!)
Back to the Kurds.


12 posted on 09/12/2014 3:22:52 AM PDT by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Gen.Blather
You didn't say anything about the Sunni and that is the pivot point dealing with Iraq/ISIS.

This is why Obama picked General Allen to head up the effort.

In the Iraq surge of 2007/2008 he was the general working to shift the Sunni to support the central govt. Obama gave him the same job in Afghanistan trying to shift the Taliban. Obama ended up with the same team in Afghanistan that Bush had in Iraq: General Petraeus, General Allen, and Ambassador Ryan Crocker.

General Allen had been picked to take the top NATO job but got caught up in the womanizing and had to retire. But, commissioned officers serve at the pleasure of the prez so Obama kept him on in Afghanistan and now gives him the top job in Iraq.

16 posted on 09/12/2014 4:27:38 AM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson