this will put the liberals panties in a bunch.
The resolution is simple:
The election judge simply asks, do you intend to vote in the state-wide election for State specific offices?
If the answer is yes, ID must be presented. State election process is the prerogative of the State.
bump
WOW! PING!
You don’t need a photo ID to vote, but you do need one to buy alcohol and cigarettes.
Despite what the left has said in the debate over Voter ID laws, it’s pretty clear that you need a photo ID to do pretty much anything, and The Washington Examiner has put together a long list.
You need one to open a bank account, or to apply for a job to fill that bank account.
You also need an ID to file for unemployment, and to apply for welfare, and Medicaid, and food stamps.
You need a photo ID to apply for Social Security
And to buy a home, and apply for a mortgage, or to rent a home.
You need a photo ID to drive a car, you need one to buy a new car, to buy a used car, heck, you even need one to rent a car.
You need a photo ID to get on an airplane, and you need one to get married, and you need one to check into a hotel room for your honeymoon.
You need a photo ID to buy a gun, and to apply for a hunting license and a fishing license, and even to adopt a pet.
You need a photo ID to pick up a prescription, you need one to buy certain kinds of cold medicine, and you need one to donate blood.
You need a photo ID to enter a casino, and you need one to buy lottery tickets.
You need one to buy a video game that’s rated M for Mature, and you need one to see a movie rated NC-17.
You need a photo ID to buy a cell phone and apply for a coverage plan and, in perhaps the greatest irony of the entire Voter ID debate, you need a photo ID to hold a rally or protest, such as a rally or protest against requiring a photo ID to vote.
AND NOW, IN WISCONSIN, YOU NEED ONE TO VOTE! FINALLY! :)
Wow.
It would be an interesting exercise to compare vote totals and results by district from this coming election to a previous election.
Why does it take a panel of judges to figure out that it’s illegal to let illegals vote?
dems require photo id to get into their own conventions.
banks require photo id.
blacks (and everyone else) buying liqour anywhere, require photo id.
blacks, driving their cars, require photo id - a license.
blacks, and everyone else, wanting any utility service where they live, require a photo id.
blacks, and anyone else, going into a federal building, require photo id.
blacks, and everyone else, flying anywhere, require photo id.
it is hardly a burden on blacks.
I remember a story where in a black church the pastor was asking people if they had id to vote. almost all of them raised their hand, the whole congregation raised their hands.
they have photo id.
this is all about them not being able to flood the election results with phony ballots, or just bus people in from chicago and locally and pretend to be people they aren’t because now they’ll have to show id.
it happens in green bay, madistan, and in my county, milwaukee. and they are pissed they are not going to be able to do it so easily
Stopping the fat- ass union pigs from voting five or ten times is significant. The next step is to form vigilance committees.
when the penalty for casting an illegal vote matches the seriousness of the crime...and only then, will liberals take this to heart. A mandatory 10 years without possibility of parole should get their attention and a life long prohibition from voting would be frosting on the cake.