That's a game changer in the same way that this new video is a game changer.
The REAL “game changer” could have been if CNN had given the “gentle giant” a job.
Where’s da plane?
Although CNN doesn’t mention it here, the contractor said he heard “two shots” separated by 30 seconds. That’s not in agreement with anything else we’ve heard.
LOL...I read the headline too quick and thought somebody had come out with a Michael Brown video game!
Would these two johnny-come-latelys be willing to testify to that effect under oath? How does their testimony mesh with the forensic evidence that seems to indicate Brown was bum-rushing Wilson? Where “eyewitness” testimony contradicts objective facts, the facts (SHOULD) win every time.
The BS is so deep in this “report” that I’ll drown if I stay on this thread.
Two shots....I’d say the only thing they saw was the ‘gentle giant” (my a**) throwing up his hands as he began to fall and the shots they heard were the last two shots. In other words....they have a piece missing that is very definite...he was running away at first.
No
Um, no. Since the “witness” was at least 50’ away, his response to the occurrence is meaningless. Doesn’t prove anything except the guy thinks the perp had his hands up in surrender.
I really do not care what anyone told anyone.
Words don’t mean anything in this country.
This is just another racist CNN hoax. For an complete analysis showing these to liars were about 250 feet away from the shooting and had their line of sight blocked by one or more buildings, see:
One of the guys in the video claims that Brown was shot in the back, while running away. Since forensic evidence shows NO wounds to the back, ANYTHING these guys say on their video is of no use...
Hmmmmm ..?? Construction workers = UNION WORKERS = plants from the DEMOCRATS ..!!!!!!
See how easy that was .. and CNN has been known to fudge and lie about this or that - for quite some time.
Until we figure out that the LEFT is not a nice group of people; they will always be able to pull stunts like this.
Just as most of us have said about the media, we don’t know for sure what happened with Brown. If the officer is in the wrong, he should face the consequences. My objection has been that the media and the representatives of blacks have assumed that the officer was wrong and that Michael Brown was merely a “gentle giant” that was persecuted by the police. These men’s statements are additional evidence, to be considered with all the rest. We should not jump to any conclusion any more than the media should not.
Any witness who says that has to be full of crap. The autopsy clearly shows Brown was shot in the front not in the back.
Studies have amply demonstrated that what someone says he saw, especially suddenly or unexpectedly, is as likely as not to be wrong. The fact that there are two of them does not change this, as they would both be subject to the same sources of distortion.
We still don't know what happened in Ferguson and should await some report from a credible investigation, including being consistent with an objective coroner's report. The reactions of these two isn't it.
I thought it said new video game. :(
People should ask themselves why CNN is so devoted to making the dead thug look like an innocent baby.