In the past, I have talked to officers about what they do and why they do it The reason why they might put a person in handcuffs, without placing them under arrest, is because the person has become a bit volatile and the officer wants to ensure the safety of him and the person he is interrogating. It does not mean anything beyond that at that point in time.
All the officer did was follow through on a complaint, which he is required to do, until he is able to fully check everything out. The reason why he would have asked her for identification was to check for priors and any warrants.
In tho situation, the police officer did nothing wrong. As far as black or white goes, it’s likely the white person, if they had nothing to hide, would have been willing to give their ID, which might account for why a cop might have acted differently.
Let yet another of us correct your stupid BS yet again.
Kissing does not constitute probable cause. And certainly it is contra-indicative of prostitution.
So no, the officer had zero requirement to do anything. This has already been pointed out.
Take your statist BS elsewhere Komerad Jonty.
A complaint that two people were kissing? That amounted to probable cause? That it would have amounted to probable cause even if both parties were white? Sorry, I don't buy that.
>>The reason why he would have asked her for identification was to check for priors and any warrants.<<
That is called searching ..... for a reason to arrest the suspect. Illegal unless you have reason to believe there was a crime committed by the suspect.
Identification to a cop is name, age, residence address.