We should be careful here. Or should we. Should we trust the government to decide which science is science and which is heresy? This is like trying to get congress to pass laws enforcing the enforcement of the constitution with criminal reprisals for deriliction of duty.
Anyway you look at it, you are inviting the source of the problem to go against it’s own instincts and natural tendency to change itself. It’s like trying to get big snakes to raise baby rats. A lot of snakes eat their own young. Same thing goes here.
We don’t want to invite anymore government oversight over anything the government has an interest. Today, unfortunately, our government is vested in EVERYTHING. They can no longer “help” fix anything for the citizenry.
[ We should be careful here. Or should we. Should we trust the government to decide which science is science and which is heresy? This is like trying to get congress to pass laws enforcing the enforcement of the constitution with criminal reprisals for deriliction of duty. ]
If we criminalize “Non-consensus Science” we would solidify the existing academic “Orthodoxy” and further cement in place the emerging “Secular Theocracy” that is struggling to establish itself....