Posted on 09/15/2014 2:14:49 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
* Victim saw man she says abused her walking the town's streets
* The now 28-year-old challenged him over claims of grooming and violence
* But when police arrived, she was handcuffed and arrested by officers
* She was 'shoved into van' by two officers in 'thuggish' arrest, witness says
* Police later realised they had been hoping to interview her over claims
* She refused to speak to them after she was reportedly pushed against wall
A victim of Rotherham's child sex abuse scandal confronted a man she says groomed her - but was left shocked when she was the one arrested.
The woman was shocked when she saw the man walking through the town's centre on Friday and decided to challenge him over the allegations.
But she was tackled by two police officers and pushed up against a wall during her 'thuggish' arrest, a witness has said.
A damning report released last month detailed how 1,400 children were sexually exploited in the area over a 16-year period.
The Times reported that a woman whose case is being investigated by authorities - but has not yet been interviewed - was arrested after tackling a man she says groomed her when she was 15.
A witness accused the police of 'acting like insensitive thugs', telling the paper: 'A police van came and six male officers piled out.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
Like any media outlet I am sure the DM makes errors. On the other hand in this story they report:
1. A woman confronted the person who she says sexually abused her.
2. Some called the cops who cam to the scene.
3. The woman was arrested for racial insensitive assault disturbing the public order.
4. She was released on police bond.
5. After she was arrested the police figure out that she had reported her abuse to another agency and they had been seeking to talk to her.
So what parts of this story are suspect to you? Certainly 3 and 4 are surely a matter public record in the UK 2 could certainly be police making up a reason ex post, but why would the DM make it up?
Certainly the woman could have been causing bodily harm to the guy in which case the police had to step in. The DM missed that aspect if so.
Still, at least we aren’t electing ours to the head office.....
We haven’t started arresting folks for quoting Winston Churchill, either.
I said the story might be 100% true, I am just always suspicious with the DM.
If this story is true, its a disgrace and heads must roll.
Touche.
LOL
RE: using violence against the victims and calling them “racist” because the perps are Indonesian?
I believe, most of the cases of child sexual abuse in Rotherham were perpetrated by Muslims of Pakistani origin.
See here:
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/16/opinion/multiculturalism-and-rape-in-rotherham.html?_r=0
1—Yep, bad gun laws.
2—Still have over 2.3m legal guns in the UK.
3-The British were never owners of guns, peak was 2.6m in 1996. British people just have never been a nation of gunowners.
Yes, that’s right. I misspoke. Thank you for the correction.
The cops assumed she was “racist”.
They may as well print up and hand out “License to Kill” cards for Muslim man and/or men from majority-Muslim nations.
Sheesh. If this story is accurate, the cops just exposed themselves fully without anybody even intending to expose them.
Undoubtedly most news is shaded by the media to effect a desired outcome among readers.
However, the sheer number of girls who were trafficked by muslims and the lack of investigation and policing makes this article believable. The callousness of those whose duty it was to protect these vulnerable children is shocking.
I am not surprised that they would arrest the victims, the same kind of cops who threatened that other woman for telling the truth
Our Muslim was elected to the White House because he made threats to the media (and probably to others as well, but the threats to the media are what is already documented). Our enemies found the weakest link in the fabric of America and exploited it - CRIMINALLY.
And it was a game-changer. The Constitutional America of the past had her brains blown out by the thugs who put Obama into our White House as a foreign enemy combatant, and the shell of the body is what the rest of us have all been trying to work with and revive ever since then.
Graphic image, I know, but that’s the truth in a nutshell.
They have been aiding and abetting the rape gangs for years and years, and still are
Have a good day.
Best,
L
5% seems to be all they need to hold the government in thrall to them. They looked the other way for over a decade while the rape gangs did their damage.
Now they arrest the victims
They have Sharia courts in the UK, recognized by the government.
“I am not saying this story isn’t true, but the DM is guilty quite often of sensational headlines, which don’t match the story or the story is incomplete.”
I’m not sure what “confronts her alleged abuser in the street” looked like (and with goo reporting I would have some idea), but I can easily see it leading to her arrest. The street is not the appropriate place to hold the trial.
Arresting the victim.... Check
Sharia law alive and well in the UK...
Five civil courts (which I opposed btw) in five English cities. Legally subordinate to English law.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.