> His use of the P.C. term “LGBTQ” makes clear to me that by “ostracized” he means “identified their sins as sins.”
Maybe, but I could understand its usage in the manner of trying to communicate an idea if the person were surrounded by the term (like you would be getting a degree in social sciences or journalism); I was lucky in that my degree [Computer Science] is/was fairly insulated from that sort of social engineering crap. — I certainly wasn’t defending the conclusions, but to dismiss the issues raised out of hand seems to be a bit... harsh, indeed, prone to a perfectionistic abuse: “You were wrong in one statement; therefore all your statements are wrong” isn’t sound reasoning.
Moreover, it seems to me that the attitude you displayed was akin to that mentioned in James 2 — https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=James+2&version=NRSV
How so?