Skip to comments.
Democrats launch Benghazi website, ahead of hearing
The Washington Times ^
| September 16, 2014
| David Sherfinski
Posted on 09/16/2014 11:14:49 AM PDT by jazusamo
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 next last
Leave it to Elijah to come up with something like this, he's got his mind made up.
1
posted on
09/16/2014 11:14:50 AM PDT
by
jazusamo
To: jazusamo
To: jazusamo
...dispel falsehoods...
that will be interesting.
3
posted on
09/16/2014 11:17:04 AM PDT
by
cyn
(Benghazi)
To: jazusamo
say theyre launching an online clearinghouse What in the heck does that even mean? Clearinghouse?????
4
posted on
09/16/2014 11:17:04 AM PDT
by
ColdOne
(I miss my poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11)
To: ColdOne
It supplies the narrative to the Dembots on social media.
5
posted on
09/16/2014 11:19:14 AM PDT
by
AppyPappy
(If you really want to annoy someone, point out something obvious they are trying hard to ignore.)
To: jazusamo
Elijah Cummings is not smart enough to come up with this kind of propaganda ploy. It likely either came from the Hildabeast’s people or VJ.
6
posted on
09/16/2014 11:20:24 AM PDT
by
drypowder
To: jazusamo
7
posted on
09/16/2014 11:22:10 AM PDT
by
longfellow
(Bill Maher, the 21st hijacker.)
To: All
8
posted on
09/16/2014 11:22:18 AM PDT
by
jazusamo
(Sometimes I think that this is an era when sanity has become controversial: Thomas Sowell)
To: jazusamo
it it:
www.whatdifferencedoesitmake.com?
9
posted on
09/16/2014 11:22:24 AM PDT
by
bigbob
(The best way to get a bad law repealed is to enforce it strictly. Abraham Lincoln)
To: drypowder
Hildy is fighting for her life.
This is why she's already visiting Iowa...not so much to run for Pres but to distract from Benghazi.
To: AppyPappy
It supplies the narrative to the Dembots on social media. Exactly. What a group of moronic automatons they are too.
They all fancy themselves clever while cut-and-pasting the same lame maddowesque excuses and links to Mother Jones or Paul Krugman articles.
11
posted on
09/16/2014 11:23:05 AM PDT
by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: jazusamo
Heres my question. How many years would a member serve in prison for going around his committee process and communicating directly with witnesses?
To: drypowder
Good point...Probably a combination of ValJar and the Beast.
13
posted on
09/16/2014 11:24:51 AM PDT
by
jazusamo
(Sometimes I think that this is an era when sanity has become controversial: Thomas Sowell)
To: jazusamo
Pubbies should counter this propaganda site with a
TruthsandFactsonBenghazi site, along with
Questions About Benghazi that the Admin/Hitlery Refuse to Answer site.
14
posted on
09/16/2014 11:25:34 AM PDT
by
Jane Long
("And when thou saidst, Seek ye my face; my heart said unto thee, Thy face, LORD, will I seek")
To: morphing libertarian
An excellent question. Am anxious to hear what Trey Gowdy has to say on this.
15
posted on
09/16/2014 11:26:29 AM PDT
by
jazusamo
(Sometimes I think that this is an era when sanity has become controversial: Thomas Sowell)
To: jazusamo
One of those facts not in dispute is that the first White Feather President in history demonstrated his profound cowardice as he left dozens to die. He can never walk away from that.
16
posted on
09/16/2014 11:28:33 AM PDT
by
jimfree
(In November 2016 my 14 y/o granddaughter will have more quality exec experience than Barack Obama)
To: jazusamo
We have looked at it, and we know where this committee is NOT going, if we can help it. said Rep. Adam Smith, Washington Democrat.
One can, without much effort, imagine the outcry if this
had been done by republicans.
17
posted on
09/16/2014 11:28:46 AM PDT
by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
To: jazusamo
Finally we’ll have the answers. LOL.
Why was more security now provided?
Why did the presideet disengage himself?
Why did the secretary of state make up a lie about the cause and nature of the attack?
Why did the president accept the lie and tell his representative to lie on all the national news shows?
Why were there no rescue attempts by the CIA or the Military authorized by anyone.
Why did the president continue lying for 13 days including to the world in his UN speech?
Why did the secretary and the president look into the eyes of the victims families and lie about the cause and nature of the attack and what they would do about it?
Why have so many witnesses been told not to say anything?
Why has it taken so long for the democrats to make the “truth” available?
What am I missing?
To: jazusamo
gee it would be terrible if this were hacked and brought down so we could bring down the scumbags who were responsible for the deaths of 4 Americans.
19
posted on
09/16/2014 11:34:23 AM PDT
by
oust the louse
(The Democratic Party might as well be called the Death Party. Abortion & ObamaCare/death panels.)
To: morphing libertarian
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson