Replies

“If you read the entire article you will find links to places like the Washington Post, New York Times and numerous others.”

But what’s striking is that this article doesn’t include a link to the very JSOU “Dividing Our Enemies” report that it is supposedly based on.

Why is that? Is it unavailable?

No, it’s readily available. I found it in seconds right here:

http://www.hoover.org/sites/default/files/uploads/inline/docs/dividingourenemies.pdf

The reason that it isn’t linked is because then you could read the report for yourself. You’d see that it’s a study on getting our enemies to fight among themselves and the unforeseen hazards of doing so.

The study doesn’t say that the “West created ISIS” or that our Special Operations Forces intended for civilians to be “caught in the crossfire”. That’s just propaganda from the fertile mind of the leftwing conspiracy crank who wrote the essay.

MintPress is a self-publishing website. The author of the piece is Nafeez Ahmed, “environment writer “for The Guardian, the leftwing British tabloid.

The late Christopher Hitchens once denounced Ahmed as “a risible individual wedded to half-baked conspiracy-mongering”

And Discover magazine “has repeatedly labelled Ahmed as a “doomer.” A December 2013 blog post says: “Once someone starts down this civilization-is-collapsing road, like Guardian blogger Nafeez Ahmed, it’s hard to stop. If you want a tour guide to the apocalypse, Ahmed is your guy.”

Read the JSOU report yourself. Nafeez Ahmed misrepresents the report and he’s spouting propaganda.

Pelham, first, it does include a link to that same report, in the paragraph just to the left of the JSOC insignia pic.

Second, just because I post an article it does not mean that I am giving any sort of approval of the author.

This guy happens to be a classic new world order propagandist.

He wrote, for example, “A USER’S GUIDE TO THE CRISIS OF CIVILIZATION And How to Save It”, published in 2010 by PlutoPress.

The piece is at the link in the article just two paragraphs below the other link; the link is at the words...

(excerpt) “US Special Operations”.
(link) http://themester.indiana.edu/themester2011/events/ahmed.pdf

That “civilization” piece, if you peruse it, is garden-variety new world order globalist hogwash, all about how there are all these calamities facing the world and everyone needs to follow the instructions of the elites to survive the coming problems. It says so much in the title.

This is why I started this thread with...

“New world order providing the interested observer with some bits of information about their current middle east operations. “

I’m simply posting this article so people can take the assertions it makes, like US special forces being there, what they are doing, and assertions like who is funding the operations, and then go and for themselves a) see if they can find other reporting or evidence which corroborates the asssertions and b) see if they can digest and analyze everything for themselves. I may make my own assertions along with posting links, etc., but my assertions are still that, just assertions. Ultimately everyone has to interpret evidence for themselves. It’s when we have already reached conclusions based on no evidence other than whatever social “echo chambers” we identify with that we can easily be misled. MANY liberals who are anti-war are today in this category to an astonishing degree, as they are so vehemently anti-war, yet their darling candidate has been President for going on six years - but his administration has increased US war and espionage activity to a spectacular degree.

American sheeple on both the left and the right are under the spell of supreme illusions put on by an elite that then uses them to step by step make their own lives miserable. It figuratively beats the American people over the head with their own government.

Also, regarding Nafeez Ahmed, the author, he perfectly fits the mold of new world order propaganda when they seek to publish small amounts of true facts.

NWO publishes small bits of true facts that incriminate themselves in a very specific manner.

First, they make sure that most of the news media and educational community never speaks of any facts that offer evidence that the general public would be angry about, for example, American-based companies trading with or financing our enemies. “Mainstream” media leadership makes sure that such stories are well buried, while 99% of their story content is aimed at pushing new world order’s desired storylines.

Also, they never have the “whole picture” put out in one document or article, since that would allow the reader/listener to see the complete set of damning evidence. For example, they’ll have drug lords in the news, and bank/money laundering in the news, but they’ll never report all the links in one story. One has to read at least several different stories, and have enough business, etc., knowledge or sophistication to be able to understand how the facts of the stories paint a disturbing picture.

The other key tactic is whenever these pieces of truth that could be damaging if analyzed alongside the other relavent truths are published - the author purposely includes other claims and assertions that set him up to be labled as a quack.

The “revealer’s” goals are to a) have himself considered a quack and b) reveal a few pieces of truth about new world order operations.

So new world order will have dozens of these quacks out there, all publishing some of what new world order is doing, mixed in with nonsensical or obviously false material.

This then leads most people to believe that the individual TRUE facts that were disclosed are ALSO FALSE. The reader is drawn to “throw the baby out with the bathwater”.

If we bear in mind that all the TRUE facts (published by different people who all appear to be quacks) need to be analyzed TOGETHER in order to understand the conspiratorial activity, we see that the groundwork has been laid for perpetuating the illusion that new world order is a false theory.

What happens is any time anyone mentions ANY of the true facts, the listener will instantly recall the “quack” association - and they will view whatever total explanatory picture is presented as being false, without even bothering to analyze all the facts. For example, any time most people hear the phrase “Federal Reserve”, it brings to mind a view that new world order is a false “quackery” conspiracy theory, because every new world order description invariably includes the Federal Reserve (but they’ll also include preposterous claims about aliens, or anti-Semitic comments, etc.).

It’s like an immunization shot being given to the public, where they are “immunized” mentally against being able to take any facts about new world order seriously.

If anyone actually writes or speaks enough truth to actually have new world order worried, and they really don’t have any control of that person, the next step is to brand the person as an anti-Semite. It’s the classic new world order fallback when they have nothing else. Of course, the American leadership is the Rockefeller interests, and the JDR family is nominally Christian (JDR Sr was a Baptist), so if one is anti-new world order, that does not imply that one is necessarily an anti-Semite. New world order is, in fact, a “religion” unto itself, with its leadership seeing themselves essentially as the “gods” of the world, that is, having the power and the right to take life at their pleasure, and to generally rule over everyone else.