Take a look at Bush’s numbers again. In his first time there was a net loss of jobs. His second term they were as anemic as Obama’s.
Take a look at Clinton’s numbers for reference. 11 million his second term, to Bush’s net loss in his first term.
The average figure of jobs created per term for the prior 40 years was over 9%. Under Bush it went negative for the first time in forty years.
Clinton’s numbers look a whole lot better than they would have otherwise, because Congress went to Newt in January 1995.
Adding to my point a few posts back is that Newt Gingrich and the "Contract with America" not only led to true prosperity and genuine job growth but plummeting gasoline prices. I look back to Gingrich era of the 1990s as a time when I was making good money, getting substantial return on my investments and paying all of 78 cents a gallon for gas! Is it any wonder that I was all in for President Newt Gingrich in 2012? His track record of success is unquestionable.