Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DCBryan1
Quietly, professionally, and deliberately, there would be some fatal “accidents” of school staff had that been my daughter.

Yep.

“Vice-Principal Dunaway testified that (the girl) was responsible for herself once she entered the bathroom,”

I can't even wrap my brain around the logic used to make this statement.

Once again, liberalism is proven to be a mental disorder...

37 posted on 09/19/2014 8:28:44 AM PDT by jonno (Having an opinion is not the same as having the answer...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: jonno

The school tried adopting a wide stance of “plausible deniability”.


42 posted on 09/19/2014 8:34:13 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (Hey Obama: If Islamic State is not Islamic, then why did you give Osama Bin Laden a muslim funeral?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: jonno
It's not just liberals. No government authority figure, and that includes school administrators, wants to be responsible to deliver on their promises.

The legal issue in this case is, I think, whether or not the school administration has a legal duty that would have prevented this incident, or did the girl "assume the risk?"

If the sting plan involved a teacher being present, and no teacher is present, the school might argue that she put herself at risk by entering the boys room.

I'm not defending the school, by the way. My point is that it is naive to trust an authority figure. They have no duty, and they tend to be liars.

43 posted on 09/19/2014 8:35:30 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson