goodwithagun, you seem to be basing this on one case which I've never heard of, some "training" you had following that case, and some internet searches which you keep telling people to do, as if the internet contains no misinformation. In other posts you admit there are gray areas. Here is the problem with your claim: there are rapes without your specified evidence. There are non-rapes even with your specified evidence. They may be rare but they exist. I require only common sense to know that, not an internet search.
If you post claims like the quote above, you are claiming, falsely, that there is a forensic formula for roughness. We all agree that getting a victim to a medical exam will lead to better outcomes in such cases. But nobody agrees with you that it is a sure thing. Nobody agrees with you that there is formula for rape roughness vs consensual roughness, except for general guidelines. Perhaps if you link an actual site, I will look, but most likely it will be a categorical screed like your "training".
Um, I’ve made no such claims that you are attributing me to. I’ve been quite fair regrading both sides of the coin. I’ve never claimed there is a “formula” for rough sex. If you’ve not heard of the Steubenville rape case you are sheltered. It became an international news story two years ago.
Why do people get so butt-hurt when the other side of this issue is presented? If you don’t want to do simple searches to educate yourself, well, that’s your prerogative. You wrote on your post that you might not even look at links if I post them. I’ll not waste my time on you.
Have a blessed Sunday.