Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jacquerie

Great history but why did they not come up with a solution when it might happen? That is our problem today.


17 posted on 09/21/2014 5:44:45 AM PDT by Deagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Deagle
The Federalist answer was that neither the people nor states would put up with a traitorous President.

Recall the electoral college. States get to determine how their electors are chosen, and IIRC most states used their legislatures to elect, via chosen electors, George Washington.

The Constitution of 1787 wasn't as Federal as the Articles of Confederation, but the states still had the power to run the show.

Only the House of Reps was designed to be out of state legislature influence. If the states were still in the senate, there wouldn't be a chance that presidents would bother to nominate anti-10th Amendment federal judges. Now, it is assumed that every rat appointee will be hostile to the 9th and 10th amendments.

The 17th must go.

22 posted on 09/21/2014 5:57:16 AM PDT by Jacquerie (Article V. If not now, when?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson