Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NBC Offers Repellent Advice on Appeasing Home Invaders
NRA-ILA ^ | 9/20/14

Posted on 09/21/2014 11:16:08 AM PDT by pabianice

Americans have a constitutional right to armed self-defense, but they have other choices as well. The University of Colorado, for example, last year offered the students it sought to disarm with statewide legislation other “crime prevention tactics.” Options for female students facing rapists included passive resistance,” biting, and self-degradation. According to one proponent of the bill to ban the lawful carrying of firearms on campuses, such threats are “why we have the whistles.”

Along similar lines, NBC’s Today Show recently offered suggestions on how to deal with violent home invaders. Their basic advice: politely defer to the intruder, but if things really get out of hand, reach for the insect repellent.

For the tips, the Today Show interviewed former NYPD detective Wallace Zeins, whose New York City pedigree was evident in his recommendations. First, Zeins instructed viewers to use their vehicles’ key fobs as a makeshift alarm. Following that, the former detective told the audience to keep a can of wasp spray in the bedroom to use as an improvised chemical weapon against a violent intruder. Further, the report suggested abandoning one’s home to the intruder as soon as possible. If captured by a violent home invader, Zeins’s advice was to comply with the attacker’s every wish, and to never lie to them.

At no time did the report suggest that firearms were a viable option. Also unclear was whether Zeins himself has abandoned the firearms he carried as a police officer in favor of bug spray to protect his own home and family.

The Today Show’s omission of firearms as a legitimate means of self-defense isn’t especially surprising, given NBC’s lengthy history of anti-gun bias. Nevertheless, while the defensive capabilities of firearms for home defense may continue to escape the attention of NBC’s producers, the legitimacy of this option has been recognized by far weightier institutions.

The Supreme Court’s Heller decision noted one of the reasons D.C.’s handgun ban was unconstitutional was that “[t]he prohibition extend[ded] … to the home, where the need for defense of self, family, and property is most acute.” The Supreme Court’s opinion in McDonald reiterated this point. State legislatures have increasingly passed Castle Doctrine legislation to protect residents who employ armed self-defense from unjust prosecution and civil liability, amplifying a doctrine well-established in Anglo-American case law.

Further, there is strong evidence that gun use is the most effective means to defend oneself from criminal attack. A 1988 study by Florida State Professor of Criminology Gary Kleck titled Crime Control Through the Private Use of Armed Force determined, “Victim resistance with guns is associated with lower rates of both victim injury and crime completion for robberies and assaults than any other victim action, including nonresistance.”

Despite their best efforts, Today and Zein inadvertently gave one sound piece of advice, when the former detective told viewers to treat home invaders “like royalty.” While he apparently meant that a victim should be as obsequious as possible to an assailant, liberty-loving Americans have a strong tradition of treating interloping monarchs to the business end of their rifles.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: banglist; homeinvasion; nra; personaldefense; selfdefense; waspspray
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last
To: jonathonandjennifer

You’re quite welcome.


41 posted on 09/21/2014 1:56:43 PM PDT by Lurker (Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59

Looks like the dawg has prior experience with the kitty taking a chunk out of his backside . . .


42 posted on 09/21/2014 1:59:32 PM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch

Zimmerman’s & Officer Wilson’s attackers were both out in public space.

A dead perp in your house with a broken window or door behind him has already committed breaking & entering.

In states with Castle Doctrine law, a homeowner who uses deadly force against forcible entry is immune from `wrongful death’ lawsuits, IIRC.


43 posted on 09/21/2014 2:06:45 PM PDT by elcid1970 ("In the modern world, Muslims are living fossils.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Vendome

Exactly.My Rottie and Shepherds will want their pound of flesh (literally)first.I will liberally apply 00 buck to what’s left.


44 posted on 09/21/2014 2:41:18 PM PDT by Farmer Dean (stop worrying about what they want to do to you,start thinking about what you want to do to them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

.45 ACP, so you don’t have to shoot twice.


45 posted on 09/21/2014 2:45:47 PM PDT by DownInFlames
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

Actually; hornet spray in a can will travel 20 feet and blind your attacker.


46 posted on 09/21/2014 2:47:42 PM PDT by DownInFlames
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

I just hope that they and their audience takes the advice.


47 posted on 09/21/2014 3:03:17 PM PDT by grumpygresh (Democrats delenda est. New US economy: Fascism on top, Socialism on the bottom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone

Not all.

Most patrol without firearms. Some have firearms with them or in the vehicle.

“Armed police!”. . .upon arrival something those that are carrying have to say, if they have time, before they proceed with a call.

Red and white vehicles in London are armed police.


48 posted on 09/21/2014 3:40:17 PM PDT by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: oldenuff2no

I am just saying in a pinch... at least you might stop him from killing you

I am NOT advocating that OVER the use of a nice 45 magnum, if you got one of those handy


49 posted on 09/22/2014 9:48:44 AM PDT by Mr. K (Palin/Cruz 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

Why You Should Not Use Wasp Spray for Self-Defense

As a professional personal defense instructor who has researched many self-defense products and legalities, I can tell you there are two things very wrong with using wasp spray for self-defense. One, federal law prohibits the use of any pesticide in a manner inconsistent with its labeling. That means it’s a felony to use it on a person. Two, and perhaps most importantly, it DOES NOT WORK!

http://oklahomapersonaldefense.com/waspspraymyth.html


50 posted on 09/22/2014 9:54:51 AM PDT by Brother Cracker (You are more likely to find krugerrands in a Cracker Jack box than 22 ammo at Wal-Mart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DownInFlames

Does Bear Spray or Wasp Spay work for Self-Defense?

http://americanpreppersnetwork.com/2014/01/does-bear-spray-or-wasp-spay-work-for-self-defense.html


51 posted on 09/22/2014 10:05:50 AM PDT by Brother Cracker (You are more likely to find krugerrands in a Cracker Jack box than 22 ammo at Wal-Mart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Brother Cracker; All
Does Bear Spray or Wasp Spay
work for Self-Defense?
Yeah...only put, a Cigarette lighter...
under the stream, "Instant Flamethrower"


52 posted on 09/22/2014 10:10:03 AM PDT by skinkinthegrass (The end move in political in always to pick up a weapon...eh? "Bathhouse" 0'Mullah? d8^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch
:Have you discussed this with Zimmerman or Wilson? The perps family will come after your butt.”

In states with a castle doctrine, a clear forced entry, and only one story they may sue but they are not getting anything.

53 posted on 09/22/2014 11:06:32 AM PDT by oldenuff2no (Retired military dog handler)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: oldenuff2no

You put the two qualifiers in order. #1 In states with a castle doctrine, #2 a clear forced entry, Not every state has a castle doctrine. In the states that do, a clear forced entry must be obvious.


54 posted on 09/22/2014 11:48:57 AM PDT by B4Ranch (Name your illness, do a Google & YouTube search with "hydrogen peroxide". Do it and be surprised.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch

“In the states that do, a clear forced entry must be obvious.”

Not always. If a person pushes in the door or follows someone else into the house uninvited you have an unlawful entry. If they display a weapon, threaten you in such a manner that you believe they are a threat to life or great bodily harm and refuse to leave then in most states the castle doctrine does apply. Every state has laws that allow the right of personal protection. Some demand that you retreat if you can, but that is not always possible and these laws recognize that as well.


55 posted on 09/22/2014 3:19:24 PM PDT by oldenuff2no (Retired military dog handler)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

I will strongly consider keeping bug spray on hand in the event I run out of ammo.


56 posted on 09/24/2014 6:41:51 PM PDT by The_Media_never_lie (The media must be defeated any way it can be done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson