Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Burning issues, ND operators ramping up as a new era of flaring governance draws near
Petroleum News Bakken ^ | Week of September 21, 2014 | Maxine Herr

Posted on 09/22/2014 7:36:14 AM PDT by thackney

North Dakota’s natural gas production rose nearly 40 million cubic feet per day in July, a 3 percent increase, and the state’s gas capture also rose, increasing from 72 percent in June to 74 percent in July indicating that the industry’s efforts to capture more gas are working.

However, those are cumulative statistics with some operators capturing more than 74 percent and others capturing less as drilling activity continuing to rise. The state’s Department of Mineral Resources Director Lynn Helms said the industry “will have to work very hard” in order to meet the upcoming requirements set by the North Dakota Industrial Commission, NDIC, that require that each operator capture 74 percent of produced gas by Oct. 1 and 77 percent by Jan. 1.

North Dakota Petroleum Council President Ron Ness told Petroleum News Bakken the greatest challenges to those operators still struggling to hit the gas capture target include delays in right-of-way approvals and the fast approaching end of the construction season.

“The right-of-way issue … is still the critical path item for collecting the largest volumes of flared gas,” Ness said. “Any help from local, state, and federal agencies to expedite the process is much needed.”

Hess plant running below capacity

One such obstacle is the Hess Tioga gas plant which is still only operating at 70 percent capacity while the company continues work to obtain federal permitting required for a small stretch of gathering pipeline near Lake Sakakawea. “That’s a major disappointment and that’s going to hold the Tioga gas plant in that 70 to 75 percent capacity through the winter and make it harder to reach that gas capture goal,” Helms said. Hess Corp. is hopeful it will obtain the necessary permits in October to be ready for the 2015 construction season. Because the first two versions of a required cultural study were deemed inadequate, Hess has issued a third version in its effort to obtain the permit. “It’s a previously disturbed corridor so I don’t quite get it,” Helms said. Hess is attempting to receive a finding of no significant impact, or FONSI, from the federal government. Oneok Partners is also seeking a FONSI for a 1.6-mile high pressure gathering line across federal and tribal lands in order to connect to its recently completed Garden Creek III plant. The Three Affiliated Tribes would prefer to not have infrastructure across the scenic Bear Den area, but Oneok has approached the U.S. Forest Service and is hopeful to obtain a FONSI from that agency.

“It’s frustrating to companies to have a 50-mile pipeline and have a 1.6-mile section of that pipeline require all this extra effort, but it’s the reality that we live in and it’s the terrain they’re trying to cross,” Helms said.

Even though these delays will affect gas capture and processing, Helms said the NDIC is very firm and will push the industry to plan ahead in order to build pipelines and achieve the gas capture goals.

Remote capture units on the rise

Helms said he recently met with an operator that does not have easy access to gas gathering pipeline, so it has made a $30 million investment by ordering 15 well site gas capture units to try to minimize flaring. “Industry is taking this dead serious and really ramped up,” Helms said.

Helms’ department has provided operators with preliminary audit information to help them identify problem areas in order to begin allocating capital for those areas. He anticipates a large increase in remote capture units being ordered in the coming months.

After October data are collected in December, the department’s audits will initiate notices of non-compliance to operators, and production restrictions would be required in January. In addition to curtailment, the department could penalize operators up to $12,500 per day for periods when it doesn’t appear the operator made a diligent effort to increase gas capture. Those complaints would not roll out until March. Those “diligent efforts” will be measured in various ways but it hinges greatly on operators effectively communicating with the department. Helms said if an operator is not meeting gas capture targets, some examples of due diligence include ensuring production is restricted, or that a sundry notice was submitted stating that well site capture units were ordered, or that perhaps there was an accounting error and information was misreported.

Reservation still trails

Flaring on the Fort Berthold Indian Reservation remained higher than the statewide average with only a 70 percent capture rate and Helms said the state and tribe are still in the process of discussing jurisdictional issues that have arisen due to a proposed gas capture plan written by the tribe. Helms said the tribe’s initial proposal already faces changes in order to meet federal regulations, and a state legal analysis expected by the end of September may require more adjustments. The tribe’s proposal bases flaring regulation on a mandated royalty system rather than what it calls a “penalty program” by the NDIC. Under the tribe’s proposed plan, operators can flare gas for 30 days, but then must pay 25 percent of royalties on new wells and 75 percent on infill wells. After 90 days, that percentage rises to 50 percent for new wells. After 180 days, operators must pay 75 percent of royalties flared on new wells and 100 percent on infill wells. New wells that are still flaring after 270 days will be subject to a 100 percent royalty payment on flared gas.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: North Dakota
KEYWORDS: bakken; energy; flaring; naturalgas

1 posted on 09/22/2014 7:36:14 AM PDT by thackney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: thackney

One problem with ND natural gas is that it have very little recoverable helium gas in it.

In the central-South, especially Texas, there were lots of radioactive elements, whose breakdown products are rare earth elements and helium. When these elements were trapped in, then released helium from granite, the gaseous helium was integrated in the underground natural gas formed there.

So you need a combination of things to generate helium. The right kind of radioactive elements, the right kind of granite to trap them in, and enough natural gas to act as a carrier, easier to recover than helium alone.


2 posted on 09/22/2014 7:57:42 AM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy ("Don't compare me to the almighty, compare me to the alternative." -Obama, 09-24-11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy
One problem with ND natural gas is that it have very little recoverable helium gas in it.

Very, very few natural gas fields have economically recoverable helium. The reason the National Helium Reserve was created was it was so hard to find.

3 posted on 09/22/2014 8:00:16 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: thackney

The Three Affiliated Tribes are greedy.
They plan to demand payment for the loss of flared gas


4 posted on 09/22/2014 8:29:22 AM PDT by South Dakota (shut up and build a bakken pipe line)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: South Dakota

That is one of the best solutions to the problem, in my opinion. Alaska did that. Gas that is flared on the North Slope is purchased by the oil company that flares it, just like the gas they consume for power.

It helped drive gas re-injection to prevent the lose of the resource along with keep the pressure up in the oil field, helping the oil production.


5 posted on 09/22/2014 8:43:21 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Here’s a map of the fields. Recovery is practical from the .3 to 7ppm found in natural gas, but needs a lot of processing to do so. On the plus side, Texas has about 35% of the world’s helium.

http://i.imgur.com/dZndzwB.jpg


6 posted on 09/22/2014 10:58:18 AM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy ("Don't compare me to the almighty, compare me to the alternative." -Obama, 09-24-11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy

I believe it is Kansas, Oklahoma and Texas together to reach that amount.

http://www.blm.gov/pgdata/etc/medialib/blm/nm/programs/0/helium_docs/pipeline_activity.Par.76617.File.dat/pipeflow.pdf

more at:

http://www.blm.gov/nm/st/en/prog/energy/helium_program.html


7 posted on 09/22/2014 11:09:56 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: thackney
After October data are collected in December, the department’s audits will initiate notices of non-compliance to operators, and production restrictions would be required in January.

So, the Feds are going to enforce a capture rule that will reduce production in the middle of winter. Nice.

8 posted on 09/22/2014 1:03:26 PM PDT by BlueMondaySkipper (Involuntarily subsidizing the parasite class since 1981)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlueMondaySkipper

State regulation and enforcement, not federal.

And if they are producing and capturing Natural Gas for the market they keep running. The problem comes from producing oil and continuing to flare the natural gas instead of bring it to the market.

This is pushing more Natural Gas on the market, not less.


9 posted on 09/22/2014 1:07:32 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson