“I would’ve supported her right to choose – to choose a life for herself, a path for herself. I would’ve died for that right like she died for mine,” she said.”
This is what passes for logic to a liberal.
She doesn’t see that her daughter didn’t get to choose to die for her mother’s “liberty”,
like she’s saying that she would choose for her murdered daughter.
Since she’s admitted that she has no qualms about killing people to pursue her “own path”, where does she draw the line at murdering people who are in her way? Only babies? What about toddlers? The elderly? Who does she think matters too much to be off the list of people she would kill to pursue her own path?