Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MasterGunner01

The Japanese Soryu-class have one big problem: politics.
No country can be sure about the future Japanese politics according to weapon exports like spare parts. Also Japan has no experience in exporting military hardware and adopting it to customers needs. The same error Australia made with Kockums. Kockums did build marvelous submarines for Sweden but had no knowledge how to export them.

The Soryu-class is big but has less range than current Australian Collins-class. Japan has less need for range than Australia.

I prefer rather small submarines like Type 210mod and tenders to extend the range. For one Virginia-class submarine you can buy about 8 Type 210mod and men them all with the crew size of one Virginia-class submarine!

What do you think would scare China more:
One Virginia-class submarine
or 8 Type 210mod?


13 posted on 10/06/2014 1:32:40 AM PDT by MHalblaub ("Easy my friends, when it comes to the point it is only a drawing made by a non believing Dane...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: MHalblaub
Eight ultra quiet diesel-electric AIP boats are better in Chinese waters than one nuke boat. This is heresy to the USN subdriver community, but not to Australia's subdrivers.

If the Aussies were to go with the Soryu-class, I'd expect they'd want to build them in Australia to prevent the kind of spares problems you suggested. They might enter into a co-development with Japan to improve any of the Soryu-class identified problems.

14 posted on 10/06/2014 10:17:20 AM PDT by MasterGunner01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson