Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

High Hopes for Russia Are Fading on Wall St.
The New York Times ^ | September 22, 2014 | Andrew Ross Sorkin

Posted on 09/24/2014 10:14:40 AM PDT by ConservingFreedom

Goldman Sachs has an office in Moscow. So do Citigroup and Morgan Stanley. JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America Merrill Lynch, too.

Russia was supposed to be a growth market for Wall Street. It is quickly turning out to be a potential financial nightmare and a political hot potato.

With the deteriorating relationship between the United States and Russia over Ukraine, and a series of punitive sanctions clearly slowing Russia’s economy, Wall Street banks are facing a conundrum: Should they stay or go?

Wall Street’s involvement with Russia has long been a source of controversy. Some critics contend that Western banks have quietly helped enrich the government of President Vladimir V. Putin while he ran roughshod over the rule of law, often confiscating assets from political opponents. [...]

(Excerpt) Read more at dealbook.nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-145 next last
To: ansel12

These are not bizzare claims. You are avoiding the issue and prove that you cannot converse in common industry practice about military strength. You have proven my point and are not a compentent military analyst. Your assessments and opinions are not worth the bandwidth post on. Lay off the booze it is showing.


121 posted on 09/24/2014 7:46:51 PM PDT by DarthVader (Politicians govern out of self interest, Statesmen govern for a Vision greater than themselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: DarthVader

So you got nothing.

Please explain this post about the the russian military today versus 1987, and give some real facts, use some sources.

To: ansel12
“The Russian military is weaker and smaller.”

That really is not true anymore.

15 posted on 9/24/2014 11:27:24 AM by DarthVader


122 posted on 09/24/2014 7:51:08 PM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

Post 28 does not measure all the intangibles. They are only numbers and quantities which do not measure things like survivability, lethality, measure of effectiveness, reliability and maintainability. If you cannot talk in these terms we will not talk. Here is a little reading assignment for you from WWI which shows a classic example of this in practice and shows how mere numerical superiority is no guarantee of victory. This is a summary (from Princeton even) of one of the greatest naval battles of all time which proves my point. This is not over analytical but a summary of all the things I mentioned. Pay attention in particular to the battle cruiser action. Look up other sources and learn:

https://www.princeton.edu/~achaney/tmve/wiki100k/docs/Battle_of_Jutland.html


123 posted on 09/24/2014 8:02:29 PM PDT by DarthVader (Politicians govern out of self interest, Statesmen govern for a Vision greater than themselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: DarthVader

No, seriously, quit laying it on with a trough and post some facts, some sources for your bizarre claims.

It should be easy to find the sources that told you that the Russian army isn’t smaller and weaker now, but is actually stronger and more powerful than it was in 1987.


124 posted on 09/24/2014 8:05:26 PM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

Here read this and learn. This is even better as it shows Fleet composition and more detail:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Jutland

You have to learn how to crawl before you can walk and walk before you can run. There is lots of research and analysis that goes into this but this is the way it is done. I will not deal with your ad-hoc methods of analyses and give them credibility.


125 posted on 09/24/2014 8:07:48 PM PDT by DarthVader (Politicians govern out of self interest, Statesmen govern for a Vision greater than themselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: DarthVader

No seriously, no articles on the battle of Jutland, post your sources and some facts to support your freakish and bizarre claims.

It should be easy to find the sources that told you that the Russian army isn’t smaller and weaker now, but is actually stronger and more powerful than the USSR forces were in 1987.


126 posted on 09/24/2014 8:10:40 PM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

Here is a even better one to prep you. This is the Battle of Zama between Hannibal and Scipio Africanus during the Second Punic War. Note the advantage of numerical superiority again.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Zama


127 posted on 09/24/2014 8:14:02 PM PDT by DarthVader (Politicians govern out of self interest, Statesmen govern for a Vision greater than themselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

FU


128 posted on 09/24/2014 8:14:28 PM PDT by DarthVader (Politicians govern out of self interest, Statesmen govern for a Vision greater than themselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

I am not posting sources to someone who does not understand the science period. If you cannot function in the analysis it is a waste of time.


129 posted on 09/24/2014 8:17:22 PM PDT by DarthVader (Politicians govern out of self interest, Statesmen govern for a Vision greater than themselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: DarthVader

Yeah, it’s my fault that during the course of an entire day, you can’t find sources that support your whacky nonsense.


130 posted on 09/24/2014 8:19:50 PM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

This conversation is finished


131 posted on 09/24/2014 8:20:10 PM PDT by DarthVader (Politicians govern out of self interest, Statesmen govern for a Vision greater than themselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

Comment #132 Removed by Moderator

To: DarthVader

There was never a conversation, you couldn’t explain your first silly post to me.

To: ansel12
“The Russian military is weaker and smaller.”

That really is not true anymore.

15 posted on 9/24/2014 11:27:24 AM by DarthVader


133 posted on 09/24/2014 8:23:06 PM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

ESAD


134 posted on 09/24/2014 8:25:53 PM PDT by DarthVader (Politicians govern out of self interest, Statesmen govern for a Vision greater than themselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
~USSR forces were in 1987.~ Russians are coming! Everybody get out of the streets!
135 posted on 09/24/2014 11:40:46 PM PDT by wetphoenix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: wetphoenix

Wow, talk about some strange stuff, an FSB operative trying to spread propaganda that the Cold War was an illusion of the West and America and President Reagan and for those of us involved in it.

You are really something, clumsy and obvious, but it is so very russian.


136 posted on 09/25/2014 7:47:42 AM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

I’m not propagating a thing, just trying to have fun or it is becoming tense here. Cold War was real and you are still into it, my friend ansel. You really need to improve your sense of irony as well.


137 posted on 09/25/2014 7:58:58 AM PDT by wetphoenix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: wetphoenix

Why shouldn’t it be tense here, we are military veterans or currently serving military and NATO troops, talking to an FSB operative from the Russian Army, as they are invading Ukraine and threatening NATO, and the West is having to prepare for possible war with you to defend civilization again.

Mocking the dangers you presented to America and the entire world only 20 odd years ago, is pure propaganda from a currently serving Russian Special Ops operative.


138 posted on 09/25/2014 8:06:17 AM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: ConservingFreedom

Those A$$holes deserve it. The McKinseyites, along with the big bankers, kept singing the praises of the BRICs. Now that India has a conservative government, they are on the mend.

The others never met the fundamental test for a functioning market - ability to enforce contracts, right to private property, right to assembly and free speech.

I haven’t heard the acronym BRIC in about 5 years now. Idiots.


139 posted on 09/25/2014 8:09:07 AM PDT by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

140 posted on 09/25/2014 8:09:52 AM PDT by wetphoenix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-145 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson