No, from some of the comments I’ve read, I’m not.
Did the LEO not ask to see his drivers license? Did the victim not comply?
Is it OK to shoot unarmed motorist? Did the victim have any weapon in his hand?
And if the LEO did not see weapon prior to firing at the victim, why did the LEO shoot the victim?
This was not even a felony stop. No crime was even committed by the victim.
Why would the LEO respond like this was some known extremely violent wanted person? Why would the LEO respond like this was an enemy combatant?
This was not justified by any stretch of the imagination and I hope anyone alleging it is justified, are not involved in law enforcement at any level.