Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dallas59

I saw it on TV news....disgusting. This is a case where support of the victim should be unanimous.


6 posted on 09/25/2014 3:03:19 PM PDT by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: grania

When the victim asked the patrolman why he was pulled over, the patrolman replied, ‘seat belt violation’.

When the seat belt laws first went into force, it was claimed that the authorities would never pull someone over for that. That has changed...

I would be all for rescinding any an all seat belt laws across the nation. All it is is a fishing license for the police to get around the 4th amendment...


41 posted on 09/25/2014 4:05:12 PM PDT by Delta Dawn (Fluent in two languages: English and cursive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: grania
This is a case where support of the victim should be unanimous.

Yet, I am sure the FR Bootlick Brigade will find a way to justify it.

54 posted on 09/25/2014 6:31:06 PM PDT by Half Vast Conspiracy (I'm done being even remotely civil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: grania
I saw it on TV news....disgusting. This is a case where support of the victim should be unanimous.

You'd think so, but here on FreeRepublic you will find a very few folks who will support a cop's right to shoot any time he feels like.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3207805/posts?page=67#67, and related posts.

61 posted on 09/25/2014 7:40:56 PM PDT by zeugma (The act of observing disturbs the observed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson