Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: exDemMom

“...they care more about people engaging in intercourse without intent of pregnancy...”

Well, what’s intercourse for?


21 posted on 09/27/2014 11:02:57 PM PDT by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: stanne
“...they care more about people engaging in intercourse without intent of pregnancy...”

Well, what’s intercourse for?

Considering the behavior of humans ever since humanity existed, I would say that the biological function of intercourse is the last thing on people's minds when they engage in that behavior. Since the evidence is that people will engage in intercourse no matter what--even if doing so can earn them a death sentence as is the case in Islamic countries--I'm perfectly okay with them taking precautions so as not to get pregnant. The way I see it, killing a baby is a far greater sin than engaging in conjugal relations with one's husband or fiance while using contraceptives.

43 posted on 09/28/2014 7:17:19 AM PDT by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson