If gay “marriage” is constitutional, then no other marriage isnt.
What would be the justification for them not?
The only justification the state in the modern era has ever needed to define marriage for itself is simply whatever judges, pols, or the majority of the voting public think about it at any one time. And that’s it, that’s all it has ever been to the state. Not surprisingly it has mutated and will keep mutating even farther beyond impossibilities like ‘gay marriage.’
Freegards