[cloudmountain]

Because we elect people to run our secular government. We don’t have a religious test for public office in this country. We elect a commander in chief, not a clergyman in chief. Those are some reasons to vote for someone who practices a religion you yourself don’t follow.

Our Lord Jesus was NOT brothers with Lucifer.

We do elect a commander-in-chief, though with Clinton we had a commander in BRIEFS. WHAT a sleeze-bag he was.

My point is that FAITH is important to me.

**Would you vote for an atheist for president?

**Would you vote for a Buddhist for president?

**Would you vote for a or Hindu as president?

**Would you vote for a Muslim for president?

**Would you vote for Mitt is he converted to Islam? If not, WHY not? After all, you said: "Because we elect people to run our secular government. We don’t have a religious test for public office in this country."

Faith may not matter to you but it DOES matter to me.

If it doesn't matter to you, then you WOULD vote for a Buddhist, Hindu, atheist or Muslim for president. Lol. I sure wouldn't. FAITH matters to me.

[Dilbert San Diego]

I would vote for a candidate of any of those faiths if they had conservative values.

In a two man race for president, it sounds like you prefer the irreligious views of Obama to the religion of Romney. Your choice if that is your preference.