Gotta admit, he looks unhappy in this picture. Must have just found out he has to clean the toilets in order to be able to sleep in the homeless shelter that night.
In English? The point I was making was, they stated he was cured and cleared. No danger to anyone, ever, ever again. This is not true if there is possible persistence and locations where the virus can live and regrow after remission inside his body.
Forget about this patient, but not the scenario. Let’s assume it was a latent persistent Ebola occurrence, which according to you is possible. He could have infected several people after the re-occurrence (wife, children, co-workers, etc...).
He still was a danger when released, albeit a small one. He only returned to the hospital after he got sick again. No other reason. If what your are saying is true he should have been monitored constantly for several weeks. Not declared cleared and no danger to anyone. For all we know, until he is cleared by the doctors of Ebola there is a chance he killed several people.
According to the World Health Organization,
even post-”treatment” (there is no cure) for Ebola
active virus is still transmitted sexually ... for months.
Where does that fit in the Obola-CDC model?
other than to make certain this goes to all 57 states
just like the EV-68.
Gotta admit, he looks unhappy in this picture. Must have just found out he has to clean the toilets in order to be able to sleep in the homeless shelter that night.