Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GingisK

Men would have insisted we stay with Assembly.


23 posted on 10/07/2014 1:23:30 PM PDT by AppyPappy (If you really want to annoy someone, point out something obvious they are trying hard to ignore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: AppyPappy
Men would have insisted we stay with Assembly.

Well, I was pretty good at assembler for a lot of different computers. I liked it! It did seem like I was forced to write stuff in FORTRAN. I stayed way clear of COBOL.

I liked 'c' from the start, and still use it now. I still write software at the borderline between hardware and software. The youngsters don't even know what to make of a register. XML my ass!

25 posted on 10/07/2014 1:31:04 PM PDT by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: AppyPappy
Men would have insisted we stay with Assembly.

They did! Sort of. They criticized Fortran for generating inefficient code. A common practice was to get an object deck of a compiled program and then patch it for a while with object changes rather than recompiling THE WHOLE THING.

I was in college in this era, and I learned by experiment that the IBM Assembler was actually a pig, and would take four or five times ( or more ? ) to assemble the same object as generated by FORTRAN. Of course, it had an excuse, since it was more general.

I think programming was dominated by men in that era, but there were a lot of women in it, too. My mom was an ace programmer, in fact. There were "keypunch girls", like typing pools, and some of them would bootstrap their way up.

33 posted on 10/07/2014 5:04:53 PM PDT by dr_lew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson