Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Outstanding commentary. Accurately asks the most important question, Why?
1 posted on 10/08/2014 6:00:51 AM PDT by winoneforthegipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: winoneforthegipper
Why?


2 posted on 10/08/2014 6:03:04 AM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: winoneforthegipper

Because we have a CIC with NO plan and NO understanding of leadership!

That has been clear for a long time now.


3 posted on 10/08/2014 6:03:56 AM PDT by SMARTY ("When you blame others, you give up your power to change." Robert Anthony)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: winoneforthegipper
Because we have put people who act like drunk teenagers in charge of our country.

They have no plan, only impulse.
They have no strategy, only tasks.
They have no goals beyond the next election.
They have no guilt over their actions, because they are always right.

4 posted on 10/08/2014 6:06:35 AM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: winoneforthegipper; All

Ssssshhhhh, it’s a strategy — It’s called leading from behind.

If you were smarter, you would understand it. But because you are a pompous, arrogant, American wind bag and you have NOT sat through any of obamalamadingdongs classes you just aren’t capable of understanding.


5 posted on 10/08/2014 6:10:00 AM PDT by areukiddingme1 (areukiddingme1 is a synonym for a Retired U.S. Navy Chief Petty Officer and tired of liberal BS.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: winoneforthegipper
“a terrible slaughter”, with “5,000 dead within 24 or 36 hours”

Another Obama legacy. The history book for these years will be interesting. And Turkey, I hope ISIS overthrows your sorry *ss.

6 posted on 10/08/2014 6:11:01 AM PDT by McGruff (we're leaving behind a sovereign, stable and self-reliant Iraq - Barack Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: winoneforthegipper
Why did the US help the Kurds in Iraq but leave Isis to massacre them in Syria?

Obama.

Next question.

7 posted on 10/08/2014 6:12:22 AM PDT by Obadiah (None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: winoneforthegipper

Just like we support Kurds in Northern Iraq and not so much in Turkey.


8 posted on 10/08/2014 6:14:51 AM PDT by Theoria (I should never have surrendered. I should have fought until I was the last man alive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: winoneforthegipper

Obama: Is there a golf course in Kobani?

Aide: No

Obama: FORE!


9 posted on 10/08/2014 6:16:59 AM PDT by Organic Panic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: winoneforthegipper

Because 0bola respects the territorial borders of all nations – except for the United States ....


11 posted on 10/08/2014 6:19:15 AM PDT by mikrofon (Humpday BUMPty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: winoneforthegipper

Chris Plante just said military leaders are leaking info because this is so bad. WaPoo hammering Obama, too.


12 posted on 10/08/2014 6:21:30 AM PDT by RushIsMyTeddyBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: winoneforthegipper

I don’t know about the American attitude toward the different populations of Kurds but the Turks distinguish between the Communist Kurds and the rest. The Communist Kurds have been the most troublesome to the Turks over the years. The Kurds in Kobani are the Communist group. The Kurds in Iraq are a mixture but the nonCommunists are the majority and run the government in Kurdistan.


14 posted on 10/08/2014 6:38:42 AM PDT by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: winoneforthegipper

Obama has no legal basis for intervention on Syrian soil.
His puppeteers made up the “Khorasan Group” thing as an excuse for attacking some Islamists (using legal authority for War on Terror from 2002).

Obama is painfully solicitous about legality when it comes to defense overseas, in inverse proportion to his habit of ignoring and bending the law domestically. One of the Benghazi excuses was that we had no agreement with Libya to enter their territory militarily. (As if a phone call to Libya’s premier wouldn’t have fixed that in an emergency).

If the President is actually interested in legalities, why hasn’t he pursued Congressional, NATO, and UN authorization?
Obama refuses to lead deliberately, because he thinks that will force others to do the right thing while deflating US hegemonism. Unfortunately, most countries of the world are highly resistant to risky altruistic adventures and will act, if at all, to pursue ulterior motives and interests. Result: evil triumphs.


15 posted on 10/08/2014 6:44:02 AM PDT by Chewbarkah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: winoneforthegipper

Because is being led by a foolish child who is in way over his head. Not since Caligula and Nero has so much power been wielded so incompetently.


17 posted on 10/08/2014 6:46:37 AM PDT by Spok ("What're you going to believe-me or your own eyes?" -Marx (Groucho))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: winoneforthegipper

Obammy is a mooselimb and a fag


18 posted on 10/08/2014 6:46:43 AM PDT by Joe Boucher (Obammy lied and lied and lied.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson