Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TangledUpInBlue

Indian squaw Liz Warren sure is getting out there and in our faces a lot.

Is it possible that the radical liberal side of the Democrat party will push her, and not Hillary, for president?

I’ve heard rumblings that the Clinton’s aren’t liberal enough for lots of Democrats.

And Warren could be the historic first woman president. No need for Hillary if there is a more liberal woman out there.


6 posted on 10/13/2014 11:05:47 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego (s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Dilbert San Diego

“Ur gettin’ SCROOOOOD and I’m just the gal to punish the guys doin’ it to ya!” is gonna resonate with a whole lot of low infos.


12 posted on 10/13/2014 11:13:13 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Dilbert San Diego

“I’ve heard rumblings that the Clinton’s aren’t liberal enough for lots of Democrats.”

Most of my liberal acquaintances during the Clinton administration thought he was too conservative and not really a liberal. After all, he ran as a “New Democrat”, socially liberal but economically a centralist. Most liberals will never forgive him for welfare reform.


20 posted on 10/13/2014 11:42:01 AM PDT by DugwayDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Dilbert San Diego

Some one’s got to tackle the economic mess if they want an easy majority. I wish Steven Ford would come forward. None of our constitutional conservatives seems to have a good economic barometer about the mess the banking system is in, and how that’s destroying any hope of recovery for the middle class.


28 posted on 10/13/2014 11:55:53 AM PDT by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson