Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Drango

As a Cherokee Indian I find it offensive that NPR, ESPN, et al think that I and other Indians are shallow enough to be offended by the Redskin name. Who is sterotyping more; The Washington Redskins or NPR?

I don’t appreciate being herded into an always offended victim classification. The liberals can mind their own business.


8 posted on 10/14/2014 1:16:15 PM PDT by MichiganCheese (The darker the culture, the brighter your light can shine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: MichiganCheese

Good for you. This politically correct nonsense is dangerous. I am glad you see it for what it is.

I realize the term could be taken as disrespectful, but I find it to be a name that calls forth noble character, strong will, bravery, and dignity.

I have never seen it as a term denigrating Native Americans. I never thought less of them for it’s use.

We live in a society that references Whites, Blacks, and yes Redskins. How is the term Redskins any more offensive than Whites or Blacks?

This is utter nonsense. I am very proud of the Washington Red Skins leadership, sticking to the name. I hope the name goes on for another century.

I also hope this backfires on the people complaining. They should be seen for who they are.


14 posted on 10/14/2014 1:29:20 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Obama and the Left are maggots feeding off the flesh of the United States.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson