Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nitzy
1.) The existence of the weapons was not widely know among the insurgency. The administration wanted us to actively look for them but didn't want the insurgents to be looking for them as well.

This seems the most plausible to me. However, why is the NYT reporting this now? It's not to give GWB credibility.

1. Ebola distraction?

2. Early news dump for Obama's/Hillary's failures in Iraq?

3. Excuse to put boots on the ground, AGAIN, in Iraq?

4. All of the above?

56 posted on 10/15/2014 6:13:44 AM PDT by Envisioning (My desire to be well informed is at odds with my desire to remain sane....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: Envisioning

I don’t think it will be an Ebola distraction. Ebola has a life of its own.

Your others points are definitely in the mix.

One other thought is that it might be an election ploy to take the focus off of Obama.


64 posted on 10/15/2014 6:19:29 AM PDT by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson